MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

















ubl message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Re: [ubl] UBL 1.1 Additions - Invoicing Requirements




From: Tim McGrath <tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au>
To: marion.royal@gsa.gov
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 08:43:14 +0800






thanks for emphasizing this. if you can supply the latest drafts from 
TBG17 it would certainly help us decide how to dispose of these.

i think the question we should ask is "How does this map to the TBG17 
draft CCs?"

as far as the question you pose. i cannot see why we wouldn't (by 
default) submit all new CCs (decontextualized BIE) we encounter to TBG17.

marion.royal@gsa.gov wrote:

> Tim,
> I haven't had the time to look at these in detail yet, but you might 
> add criteria that considers published and pending TBG17 ACCs.
> At minimum, the question should be added - Shall a new ACC be 
> submitted to TBG17?
>
> Kindest regards,
> Marion
>
> --------------------------
> Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
>
>
>
>