MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
















ubl message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: What namespace should be used for customization?




From: Mikkel Hippe Brun <mhb@itst.dk>
To: ubl@lists.oasis-open.org
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 12:04:47 +0200






The "Guidelines For The Customization fo UBL v1.0 Schemas" does not state
clearly if the NDR Namespace Rules must be followed when creating a
customizers target namespace. 

NMS3 states that "UBL namespaces MUST only contain UBL developed schema
modules".

Is it correctly understood that - according to the above rule - the
following namespace would be in conflict with the NDR:

urn:oasis:names:dklc:ubl:schema:xsd:invoice-1.0

If we use our national NDR-rules for creating the target namespace it would
look something like this:

http://rep.oio.dk/ubl/xml/schemas/1.0

In other words are we free to create our own target namespace for the
purpose of customization?


Best regards

Mikkel Hippe Brun 
Chief Consultant, M.Sc.
Phone: +45 3337 9220
Cell: +45 2567 4252
E-mail: mhb@itst.dk

National IT and Telecom Agency
Office of IT Strategy
Holsteinsgade 63
DK-2100 Copenhagen �
Denmark
Phone: +45  3545 0000
Fax: +45 3545 0010
www.itst.dk
itst@itst.dk 






Follow-Ups:

Re: [ubl] What namespace should be used for customization?
From: jon.bosak@sun.com








[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]