MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
















ubl message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: RE: [ubl] draft proposal re un/cefact




From: "Kama, Kamarudin Bin Tambi" <kama@crimsonlogic.com>
To: "Tim McGrath" <tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au>,       "Universal Business Language" <ubl@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 09:40:24 +0800






Thanks Tim, my comments below,

1. The word "appropriate" seems a compromise. It does not send a clear
signal to the industry, which may lead to hesitatation, in terms of
adoption. Can we have it replaced with the word "the".

2. When we add more documents into either PSC or TSC, that does not
constitute major version, right? What then constitute major version?

Rgds
Kama