MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

















ubl message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: [ubl] UBL 1.1 Additions - Invoicing Requirements




From: "Michael Dill" <dill2@gefeg.com>
To: "Michael Dill" <dill@gefeg.com>,"Tim McGrath" <tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au>,<marion.royal@gsa.gov>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 14:31:48 +0100







Hi,
5th January the latest TBG Library has been sent (both as spreadsheets and
EF55) to the TBG17 list of voting members. The UBL representative could
forward these data to the UBL list.
Regarding the spreadsheets please be aware that there is a column Z, where
the entries are distinguished by different status of harmonization.

Michael

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Tim McGrath [mailto:tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au]
Gesendet: Montag, 17. Januar 2005 01:43
An: marion.royal@gsa.gov
Cc: ubl
Betreff: Re: [ubl] UBL 1.1 Additions - Invoicing Requirements


thanks for emphasizing this. if you can supply the latest drafts from
TBG17 it would certainly help us decide how to dispose of these.

i think the question we should ask is "How does this map to the TBG17
draft CCs?"

as far as the question you pose. i cannot see why we wouldn't (by
default) submit all new CCs (decontextualized BIE) we encounter to TBG17.

marion.royal@gsa.gov wrote:

> Tim,
> I haven't had the time to look at these in detail yet, but you might
> add criteria that considers published and pending TBG17 ACCs.
> At minimum, the question should be added - Shall a new ACC be
> submitted to TBG17?
>
> Kindest regards,
> Marion
>
> --------------------------
> Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
>
>
>
>