OASIS Universal Business Language (UBL) TC

 View Only

Agenda for Atlantic UBL TC call 15 February 2006

  • 1.  Agenda for Atlantic UBL TC call 15 February 2006

    Posted 02-15-2006 00:41
     MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

    ubl message

    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


    Subject: Agenda for Atlantic UBL TC call 15 February 2006


    AGENDA FOR ATLANTIC UBL TC MEETING
    16H00 - 18H00 UTC WEDNESDAY 15 FEBRUARY 2006
       08h00 - 10h00 Wed San Francisco
       11h00 - 13h00 Wed New York
       16h00 - 18h00 Wed London
       #############################################
       STANDING INFORMATION FOR UBL CONFERENCE CALLS
       U.S. domestic toll-free number: (866)839-8145
       Int. access/caller paid number: (865)524-6352
       Access code: 5705229
       #############################################
    
    STANDING ITEMS
    
       Additions to the calendar:
          http://ibiblio.org/bosak/ubl/calendar.htm
       Subcommittee and team updates to Pacific call status reports
       Review of Pacific call
       Schedule review
    
    UBL 2.0 BPSS DEFINITIONS
    
       From the Pacific call 14 February 2006:
    
          SG: Can we publish the BPSS definitions for UBL separately
          from the SBS?  The definitions allow implementation of UBL
          in an ebXML framework; each UBL doc has one or more
          processes associated with it, and vice versa.  The
          definitions for 1.0 are in the UBL 1.0 SBS package, but now
          they've become a deliverable in their own right.
    
          AGREED (pending concurrence in the Atlantic call) to publish
          the BPSS process definitions for UBL as a separate
          specification.
    
    ISSUES MANAGEMENT
    
       From the Pacific call 14 February 2006:
    
          AGREED (pending concurrence in the Atlantic call) that SG
          will fill the position of Inquiry Coordinator so that
          questions submitted during the review period get forwarded
          to the appropriate SC or the TC as a whole.
    
    BRUSSELS F2F
    
       From the Pacific call 14 February 2006:
    
          AGREED (pending concurrence in the Atlantic call) to go with
          the week of 22 May 2006 at CEN/CENELEC in Brussels.
    
    UUID, GUID, OID, UID
    
       From the Pacific call 14 February 2006:
    
          AGREED (pending concurrence in the Atlantic call) to change
          GUID to UID and make the definition for UID the one that's
          currently given for GUID.
    
    ACTION ITEM REVIEW
    
       ACTION: MB to check with PB regarding interest in forming an
       OASIS UBL LSC for Northern Europe.
    
       ACTION: TC to review the extension paper from BR; JB to put on
       the agenda for [this] week.
    
    NDR WORK SESSION
    
       We need to understand and resolve the issue summarized below
       from the Pacific TC call.
    
       /=================================================================
       | CODE LIST DECLARATIONS
       | 
       |    See
       | 
       |       http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200602/msg00032.html
       |       http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200602/msg00033.html
       |       http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200602/msg00034.html
       |       http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200602/msg00035.html
       |       http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200602/msg00036.html
       |       http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200602/msg00037.html
       |       http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200602/msg00038.html
       |       http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200602/msg00039.html
       | 
       |    We note that TonyC and MartyB were assigned the task of writing
       |    the NDRs for code lists.  This must be added to the NDR items
       |    of work.
       | 
       |    A long, confused discussion took place in which the following
       |    points became more or less clear:
       | 
       |     - We don't need rules that tell people how to implement the
       |       ATG rules, because we're not adopting the ATG methodology,
       |       just the schemas.  We don't want to generate the ATG code
       |       list schemas, we just want to import them.
       | 
       |     - This presents a problem for FX (nee EDIFIX) because the ATG
       |       code list schemas are generated from the ATG data models
       |       based on the ATG NDRs; the version of FX that's programmed
       |       to support UBL doesn't know how to just import a given
       |       schema.
       | 
       |     - We must minute the position that we don't want rules to
       |       execute the UDT, we just want to import the schema at schema
       |       generation time.  That is, by our decision in Manhattan
       |       stated as "AGREED that in the interests of convergence we
       |       will stand by our decision to import the ATG2 UDT, etc." we
       |       need to add that this does NOT mean that we are going to
       |       apply the ATG2 RULES (in which case we may need more rules
       |       to cover this).
       | 
       |     - The current SDT is actually UBL's QDT.  It is possible that
       |       at some point we will have to handcraft a QDT for UBL.
       \=================================================================
    
    OTHER BUSINESS
    
    Jon Bosak
    Chair, OASIS UBL TC
    


    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]