OASIS Universal Business Language (UBL) TC

 View Only

  • 1.  RE: [ubl] Comments on (and questions about) latest schemas and spreadsheets

    Posted 09-06-2006 12:28 
    Peter,

The decision was made, after much discussion, at the F2F in Montreal.

-Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Borresen [mailto:PLB@itst.dk] 
Sent: Wednesday, 06 September 2006 0556
To: Grimley Michael J NPRI; ubl@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: SV: [ubl] Comments on (and questions about) latest schemas and spreadsheets

Hi Mike

Thanks for your valuable comments.

Why should UBLVersionID be optional? I thought we agree to make it mandatory so every instance uses this version method. This was said in the actionlist for PRD3. To my opinion this was THE change that could argue for going into PRD3. I guess the NDR and the model has crossed eachother on this point. I think we will have to debate this issue on the Atlantic call later today.

/Peter

-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: Grimley Michael J NPRI [mailto:GrimleyMJ@Npt.NUWC.Navy.Mil]
Sendt: 5. september 2006 22:58
Til: UBL List (ubl@lists.oasis-open.org)
Emne: [ubl] Comments on (and questions about) latest schemas and spreadsheets


CBC:

    Truncation issues:


  • 2.  SV: [ubl] Comments on (and questions about) latest schemas and spreadsheets

    Posted 09-06-2006 12:34 
    Ok, I have emailed with Tim, and I am convinced. I am working at having out
for the next schema production.

/Peter

-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: Grimley Michael J NPRI [mailto:GrimleyMJ@Npt.NUWC.Navy.Mil]
Sendt: 6. september 2006 14:29
Til: Peter Borresen
Cc: ubl@lists.oasis-open.org
Emne: RE: [ubl] Comments on (and questions about) latest schemas and
spreadsheets


Peter,

The decision was made, after much discussion, at the F2F in Montreal.

-Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Borresen [mailto:PLB@itst.dk] 
Sent: Wednesday, 06 September 2006 0556
To: Grimley Michael J NPRI; ubl@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: SV: [ubl] Comments on (and questions about) latest schemas and
spreadsheets

Hi Mike

Thanks for your valuable comments.

Why should UBLVersionID be optional? I thought we agree to make it mandatory
so every instance uses this version method. This was said in the actionlist
for PRD3. To my opinion this was THE change that could argue for going into
PRD3. I guess the NDR and the model has crossed eachother on this point. I
think we will have to debate this issue on the Atlantic call later today.

/Peter

-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: Grimley Michael J NPRI [mailto:GrimleyMJ@Npt.NUWC.Navy.Mil]
Sendt: 5. september 2006 22:58
Til: UBL List (ubl@lists.oasis-open.org)
Emne: [ubl] Comments on (and questions about) latest schemas and spreadsheets


CBC:

    Truncation issues:


Related Content