MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
















ubl message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Draft 10.1 Schema Review - CBC Schema




From: Grimley Michael J NPRI <GrimleyMJ@Npt.NUWC.Navy.Mil>
To: "UBL List (E-mail)" <ubl@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 15:41:55 -0500






Greetings,

It looks to me as if the CBC schema has not changed much (if any).

We still have:

    <xsd:element name="StreetName" type="udt:NameType"/>
    <xsd:element name="AdditionalStreetName" type="udt:NameType"/>


We should have:

    <xsd:complexType name="StreetNameType">
        <xsd:simpleContent>
            <xsd:extension base="udt:NameType"></xsd:extension>
        </xsd:simpleContent>
    </xsd:complexType>

    <xsd:element name="StreetName" type="StreetNameType"/>


In the CAC Schema (or wherever), we should see declarations such as:

    <xsd:element ref="cbc:StreetName"/>

    <xsd:element name="AdditionalStreetName" type="cbc:StreetNameType"/>


Reference from NDR (wd-ublndrsc-ndrdoc-V1pt0Draftp.doc):

    [Line 1848]: BBIE properties are represented with complex types.

    [CTD3] Every ccts:BBIEProperty xsd:complexType definition content model MUST use the xsd:simpleContent element.

    [CTD4] Every ccts:BBIEProperty ComplexType content model xsd:simpleContent element MUST consist of an  xsd:extension element. 

    [CTD5] Every ccts:BBIEProperty xsd:complexType content model  xsd:base attribute value MUST be the ccts:CCT of the unspecialised or specialised UBL datatype as appropriate. 

-----

Thank You,
Mike Grimley 






Follow-Ups:

Re: [ubl] Draft 10.1 Schema Review - CBC Schema
From: Tim McGrath <tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au>








[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]