MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
ubl message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ubl] Using CCs correctly (was Re: [ubl] Review of Two Diffs (Michael/Sue's and Stephen's))
Ok,
here is my 2-cent opinion:
Mark
is correct in pointing out the issues with the current UBL Library in relation
to applying CCTS and the missing CC�s.
Tim
is correct that there is a cooperation with UBL and TBG17, and this should work
in the way that UBL uses CCTS to build its library, it uses TBG17 SGP and
submission form to submit to TBG17, and TBG17 gives back the result which UBL
implements. If not, well I agree with Sue, that then there is not much point in
the exercise.
Michael is not correct in that the first draft ACC�s has been TBG
approved, but they hopefully will by Washington. For SGP this is also
true!
In
summary:
Could the current UBL Library be better in relation to compliance with
CCTS? - Yes!
Will
we soon have CC�s to work with? - Yes!
Will
TBG17 respond to the UBL submission? - Yes?
Will
UBL comply with the response and feedback? - That is left to be
seen!
But
one thing is for sure: There is no reason, no point, no resources and no way
that UBL should keep a separate track nor even begin to consider being a
full-time proprietary standards organisation in the area of data definitions,
maintenance, etc. There are more than enough of those.
Best Regards
Stig Korsgaard
M.Sc.E Standardisation Manager
Tel:
+45 3370 1083
Cell: +45
2725 9083
Mail:
stk@finansraadet.dk
Danish Bankers
Association
Amaliegade
7
DK-1256 Copenhagen K
Tel: 3370
1000
Fax:
3393 0260
mail@finansraadet.dk
www.finansraadet.dk