OASIS Universal Business Language (UBL) TC

 View Only

Re: [ubl] UML diagrams of xCBL OrderDetail

  • 1.  Re: [ubl] UML diagrams of xCBL OrderDetail

    Posted 11-07-2001 20:03
    
    [dcarlson@ontogenics.com:]
    
    | Per Tim McGrath's request, I'm creating UML class diagrams
    | reverse-engineered from the SOX schemas for xCBL Order Header and
    | OrderDetail (which is composed of ItemDetail and PackageDetail).
    | 
    | The attached PDF file contains diagrams for OrderDetail. [...]
    
    Thanks to Dave for posting this, but given the limited
    distribution of the ubl list, I think we need to reserve it for
    announcements, votes, and other formal TC business.
    
    One place Dave might have posted his message instead is the Tools
    & Techniques list (ubl-ttsc), but I can see why he didn't -- the
    subject of his posting cuts across subcommittees and is something
    in which a lot of us might be interested.
    
    We have a list that the whole world can subscribe to
    (ubl-comment), and in the interests of hearing from a wider group
    of people and eventually fostering a sense of community, I'd like
    to see as much of this good general-interest stuff as possible
    posted there instead of the ubl list proper.  Kris Ketels's
    posting of the ISO 15022 draft to ubl-comment was a good start; if
    there's to be any general discussion of that outside of the ndrsc,
    that's where I think it should happen.
    
    If we're too successful in getting people to use ubl-comment as a
    community forum then of course we'll have to pull back into the
    restricted lists again, but for the time being I'd like to give
    this a try.  So: 
    
     - If it relates to TC procedure, post it to ubl@lists.oasis-open.org
    
     - If it relates to a particular SC, post it to that SC's mail
       list (or ask the SC chair to post it if you're not a member)
    
     - If it's of interest to more than one SC, try ubl-comment so
       that the whole world gets a chance to participate in the
       discussion (and we'll pull back into our shell if things
       get out of hand).
    
    Jon