OASIS Universal Business Language (UBL) TC

 View Only

Re: [ubl] A Codelist Issue

  • 1.  Re: [ubl] A Codelist Issue

    Posted 03-12-2004 00:02
     MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

    ubl message

    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


    Subject: Re: [ubl] A Codelist Issue


    
    
    On 03/11/2004 04:07 PM, Jon.Bosak@Sun.COM wrote:
    > A note to put this discussion in perspective.
    > 
    > We did in fact discuss the use of substitution groups and abstract
    > types for code lists in Washington, and we did come to an
    > agreement among the people attending that we could live with
    > making an exception to the NDRs for code lists to allow these
    
    but no discussion took place regarding an exception to the rule
    that types cannot be abstract, which I understand from previous
    emails is also part of the proposal.
    
    > constructs.  But we did not have a quorum at that meeting, so that
    > agreement cannot be considered a real consensus.  Arriving at that
    > consensus is what we're doing now, out on the TC list where
    > everyone can see it.
    > 
    > My own position at this point leans toward the views expressed by
    > Tony and Anne: this approach does look promising, but if we can
    > get UBL 1.0 done without modifying the rule about substitution
    > groups to do it and make that decision when we understand its
    > implications better, then that is what we should do.  (As people
    > who have worked on projects like this with me before will
    > remember, I consider this always to be the right course of action
    > in circumstances like these.)
    > 
    > The two big questions remaining for me right now regarding
    > substitution groups are these:
    > 
    >  - Is it really true that a future solution that uses substitution
    >    groups will be backward-incompatible with one that does not?
    > 
    >  - Are we introducing a feature that will make the construction of
    >    RNG and ASN.1 versions of the schemas impossible?  We chose to
    >    make XSD the normative form for political reasons, but we are
    >    under an obligation to respect ISO and ITU standards as well as
    >    W3C recommendations, and this means not doing anything that
    >    would make those alternatives impossible to construct.
    > 
    > Jon
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl/members/leave_workgroup.php.
    > 
    
    -- 
    Eduardo Gutentag               |         e-mail: eduardo.gutentag@Sun.COM
    Web Technologies and Standards |         Phone:  +1 510 550 4616 x31442
    Sun Microsystems Inc.          |         W3C AC Rep / OASIS BoD
    


    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]