OASIS Universal Business Language (UBL) TC

 View Only

Specialised vs. specialized

  • 1.  Specialised vs. specialized

    Posted 04-15-2004 00:32
     MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

    ubl message

    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


    Subject: Specialised vs. specialized


    Folks,
    
    I've just made a truly sad discovery: a usage I thought was
    preferred British is not.  We decided a while ago to use Oxford
    English, and that means the Oxford English Dictionary.  I thought
    up till now that Oxford English meant "specialised" rather than
    "specialized."  But on checking I have just discovered that not
    only does the OED prefer "ize" to "ise" *in general*, but it does
    not even have an entry for "specialised."  And if it ain't in the
    OED, it ain't English no matter where you live.  (The form with
    the s does appear in some of the historical citations, but unlike
    "despatch," it doesn't rate a listing as a recognized alternative.
    Same with "customise," which doesn't even appear in citations.)
    
    Unless someone can find me a British authority of equal weight to
    the contrary (and no, I don't count something like Chambers as
    equal to the OED), I'm going to have to change this.
    
    Fortunately this will be a fairly straightforward task in the
    master document text, the file names, and the schemas, and I'm up
    to doing it for the build due out Friday night.  But it will
    also require changes in the following two illustrations, for which
    I do not have the original art:
    
       Figure 2
       Figure B-5
    
    Jon
    


    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]