OASIS Universal Business Language (UBL) TC

 View Only

Re: [ubl] My original comments on aligning with ATG2 CCT schemas

  • 1.  Re: [ubl] My original comments on aligning with ATG2 CCT schemas

    Posted 11-19-2004 02:49
     MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

    ubl message

    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


    Subject: Re: [ubl] My original comments on aligning with ATG2 CCT schemas


    the requirement is my personal expectation.  I should have been more clear.
    
    Eduardo Gutentag wrote:
    
    >
    >
    > On 11/17/2004 06:50 PM, Tim McGrath wrote:
    >
    >> Following the meetings this week I have been asked to resend  my 
    >> original comments on the alignment of ATG2 CCT schemas and UBL 1.0 ones.
    >>
    >> The message can be found at: 
    >> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200409/msg00000.html
    >>
    >> However, some of this is now history as the ATG2 group have been 
    >> revising their draft schemas.  for exmaple, i have been informed that 
    >> some of these comments (such as the naming of attributes) are resolved.
    >>
    >> My personal opinion is that we should aim to have one definitive set 
    >> of schemas (owned by ATG2) for UBL 2.0. The caveat on this is that we 
    >> have to support backward compatibility with UBL 1.0 documents. So in the 
    >
    >
    > Without committing myself one way or another regarding the wisdom of
    > doing things one way or another: where is this requirement coming from?
    > I thought there was agreement that the difference between major and minor
    > versions was that major versions were allowed to introduce 
    > incompatibilities
    > as regards previous versions; in fact, the definition I've always
    > carried in my mind between a minor version and a major version is that
    > a major version is major by virtue of introducing at least one 
    > incompatible
    > feature, not by virtue of passing some kind of lithmus test bound to an
    > arbitrary number of new or modified features.
    >
    >
    >> interim we need to work towards convergence both with the ATG2 (and 
    >> OAG) schemas as they develop. 
    >
    >
    > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster 
    > of the OASIS TC), go to 
    > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl/members/leave_workgroup.php. 
    >
    >
    
    -- 
    regards
    tim mcgrath
    phone: +618 93352228  
    postal: po box 1289   fremantle    western australia 6160
    
    DOCUMENT ENGINEERING: Analyzing and Designing Documents for Business Informatics and Web Services
    (coming soon from MIT Press)
    http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/item/default.asp?sid=632C40AB-4E94-4930-A94E-22FF8CA5641F&ttype=2&tid=10476
    
    
    
    
    


    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]