Hi
I dont thinks its at problem using cbc in
the CommonExtensionComponents.
But respond asap. Gefeg is working on this
today.
________________________________________
Alan
Lund Lemming
WM-data
Lautrupvang 10
2750 Ballerup
Tlf.: +45 44 78 40 00
Fax: +45 44 78 40 01
Mobil: +45 25 18 81 58
Fra: Frank Rast
[mailto:rast@gefeg.com]
Sendt: on 06-09-2006 11:34
Til:
Lemming Alan Lund
Cc: Michael Dill; David Kruppke; Sylvia
Webb
Emne: AW: First PRD3 Schema Review
Hi Alan,
we proposed changes to the
UBL-CommonExtensionComponents-2.0.xsd.
These proposed changes to
UBL-CommonExtensionComponents-2.0.xsd in detail
are:
- remove the cbc
namespace declaration
- remove the cbc import
- define ExtensionID as
element
- substitute cbc:ID with ExtensionID
- define ExtensionName as
element
- substitute cbc:Name with ExtensionName
The reasons for
these changes are:
- a dependancy to cbc is not wanted because the cbc
schema is derived from
the ccts data model.
- a cyclic dependency would be
introduced into the namespace dependancy
graph of
ubl
illustration by
prefix:
ext <---
maindoc
^
|
|
|
|
|
cbc <------*
- the naming
scheme of the referenced elements in UBLExtensionType is to
prefix element
names with "Extension" the use of ID and Name is an
exception to the naming
scheme
Until we get a ok for this proposal we will use
the
UBL-CommonExtensionComponents-2.0.xsd provided by you.
Since these are
only minor changes that do have any impact on the semantic
expressed in the
schema we hope it will be ok.
Best regards,
Frank
Rast
=========================================
GEFEG mbH
Storkower
Strasse 207
D-10369 Berlin
Tel.: +49 30 97 99 14 57
Fax.: +49 30 97 99
14 22
Mailto:rast@gefeg.com
=========================================