OASIS Universal Business Language (UBL) TC

 View Only

Minutes of Atlantic UBL TC call 15 February 2006

  • 1.  Minutes of Atlantic UBL TC call 15 February 2006

    Posted 02-15-2006 17:10
     MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

    ubl message

    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


    Subject: Minutes of Atlantic UBL TC call 15 February 2006


    MINUTES OF ATLANTIC UBL TC MEETING
    16H00 - 18H00 UTC WEDNESDAY 15 FEBRUARY 2006
    
    ATTENDANCE
    
       Jon Bosak (chair)
       Mike Grimley
       Bryan Rasmussen
       Zarella Rendon
       Paul Thorpe
    
    STANDING ITEMS
    
       Additions to the calendar:
          http://ibiblio.org/bosak/ubl/calendar.htm
    
          None.
    
       Subcommittee and team updates to Pacific call status reports
    
          None.
    
       Review of Pacific call
    
          No comments.
    
       Schedule review
    
          PT: Add ASN.1 to the schedule; put "delivery of ASN.1
          schema" in the week following schema generation.
    
    UBL 2.0 BPSS DEFINITIONS
    
       From the Pacific call 14 February 2006:
    
          SG: Can we publish the BPSS definitions for UBL separately
          from the SBS?  The definitions allow implementation of UBL
          in an ebXML framework; each UBL doc has one or more
          processes associated with it, and vice versa.  The
          definitions for 1.0 are in the UBL 1.0 SBS package, but now
          they've become a deliverable in their own right.
    
          AGREED (pending concurrence in the Atlantic call) to publish
          the BPSS process definitions for UBL as a separate
          specification.
    
             Agreed.
    
    ISSUES MANAGEMENT
    
       From the Pacific call 14 February 2006:
    
          AGREED (pending concurrence in the Atlantic call) that SG
          will fill the position of Inquiry Coordinator so that
          questions submitted during the review period get forwarded
          to the appropriate SC or the TC as a whole.
    
             Agreed.
    
    BRUSSELS F2F
    
       From the Pacific call 14 February 2006:
    
          AGREED (pending concurrence in the Atlantic call) to go with
          the week of 22 May 2006 at CEN/CENELEC in Brussels.
    
             Agreed.
    
    UUID, GUID, OID, UID
    
       From the Pacific call 14 February 2006:
    
          AGREED (pending concurrence in the Atlantic call) to change
          GUID to UID and make the definition for UID the one that's
          currently given for GUID.
    
             Agreed.
    
             PT: Note that France Telecom has a tool that lets you
             generate and register UUIDs at no charge.
    
    ACTION ITEM REVIEW
    
       ACTION: MB to check with PB regarding interest in forming an
       OASIS UBL LSC for Northern Europe.
    
          Carried over to next week's meeting.
    
       ACTION: TC to review the extension paper from BR; JB to put on
       the agenda for [this] week.
    
          BR: This was a very rough draft; would like to update.
    
          ACTION: BR to send us an updated proposal including a more
          extensive use of schematron by next week; TC to review and
          be prepared to discuss in the Atlantic meeting 1 March 2006.
    
    NDR WORK SESSION
    
       (See the background provided in the agenda for this meeting)
    
       MG: Remember the statement arrived at in Manhattan:
    
          "UBL's use of the UN/CEFACT Unqualified Datatype schema
          module is primarily confined to its importation. It must not
          be assumed that UBL's adoption of the UDT schema module
          extends to any of ATG's rules that have a bearing on the use
          of the UDT."
    
       This seems to capture the fact that we're adopting the ATG2 UDT
       but not the ATG2 methodology.
    
       JB: Do we still think that including the ATG2 UDT module is a
       step toward convergence?
    
       MG: Yes.
    
       JB: Then it looks like we don't have a problem.  Let's put this
       on the agenda for next week to see whether there's any
       need to discuss this further.
    
       BR: The disallowance of ANY in the current NDRs will have to
       change if the extension proposal is adopted.
    
       JB: So noted.
    
    OTHER BUSINESS
    
       ACTION: JB to send ZR the voting membership spreadsheet.
    
    Jon Bosak
    Chair, OASIS UBL TC
    


    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]