OASIS Universal Business Language (UBL) TC

 View Only

Re: [ubl] Evaluation report on UNECE/CEFACT 2005 - recommendationsfor Trade

  • 1.  Re: [ubl] Evaluation report on UNECE/CEFACT 2005 - recommendationsfor Trade

    Posted 05-18-2006 14:57
     MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

    ubl message

    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


    Subject: Re: [ubl] Evaluation report on UNECE/CEFACT 2005 - recommendationsfor Trade


    Thanks Ken
    
    Doesn't this mean we might just be a little hasty in planning
    a move of work for UBL 3 or equivalent to under CEFACT? - if
    the UNECE take this report to heart.
    
    All the best
    
    Steve
    
    
    Quoting "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>:
    
    > Hi folks,
    >
    > This came across my radar today ... a blog entry from 16 Sept. 2005 
    > by Klaus Korners[1] referring to an evaluation report[2] (similar to 
    > an auditor's report) on UNECE/CEFACT triggered during the 59th Annual 
    > Session of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) 
    > in which Member States decided to commission a comprehensive report 
    > on the state of the UNECE.
    >
    > The report is dated June 30, 2005 and OASIS is mentioned in the report.
    >
    > The PDF file of the report created by the external evaluators makes 
    > interesting reading in Chapter 7.6 "Trade Development and Timber 
    > Division" summarizing their analysis of UNECE Sub-programme 6: "Trade 
    > Development".  Page numbers below are from the evaluators' report.
    >
    > Page 61 mentions references member country replies recommending "to 
    > leave trade facilitation issues to other organizations, such as the 
    > World Bank (for policy and technical assistance), the WTO (for 
    > negotiations and technical assistance) and UNCTAD (for policy 
    > discussions), and the development of e-business tools to the private 
    > sector, OASIS (Organization for the Advancement of Structured 
    > Information Standards) and ISO (International Organization for 
    > Standardization), to name but a few."
    >
    > In "Findings (Trade)": (p.62) "Besides the WTO and the UNECE, there 
    > are many other international organizations active in trade 
    > facilitation." and (p.63) "It is likewise difficult to see a role for 
    > the UNECE in the area of technical assistance in trade facilitation."
    >
    > In "Recommendations (Trade)": (p64) "To embark on technical 
    > assistance interventions only if they support and contribute to the 
    > programmes of these other players."
    >
    > And on the same page 64: "In addition the evaluation team recommends 
    > that the UNECE consider: ... Leaving the development of standards for 
    > electronic business to other players, notably to private sector 
    > enterprises and their organizations;"
    >
    > I don't know what weight this evaluation report has, but I found it 
    > interesting reading and thought others might as well.  I apologize if 
    > committee members are already aware of the report ... I don't 
    > remember seeing the report being cited on the list.
    >
    > . . . . . . . . . . . . Ken
    >
    > [1] Klaus Korners - 16 September 2005:
    > http://www.klauskorner.com/MyBlog/E03545EB-B9E8-435B-94AB-20DC8AB5C732.html
    >
    > But let's get to the bottom line auditors message without any further delay.
    > The report looked at the core issue of relevance of UNECE programs and
    > generally recommended to focus on roles in which it has a clear competitive
    > advantage and in the case of CEFACT to leave the development of standards for
    > electronic business to other players, notably to private sector enterprises
    > and their organizations. The report lists OASIS (Organization for the
    > Advancement of Structured Information Standards) and ISO (International
    > Organization for Standardization), to name but a few of those other
    > organizations. The auditors also said other organizations providing
    > development of trade-related standards, including the ITU and ISO, were said
    > to be working in a more efficient and transparent way.
    >
    > [2] THE STATE OF THE UNECE - External evaluation report - June 30, 2005:
    > http://www.unece.org/commission/2005/UNECE_Evaluation_Report_2005.pdf
    >
    >
    >
    > --
    > Registration open for XSLT/XSL-FO training: Wash.,DC 2006-06-12/16
    > Also for XSL-FO/XSLT training:    Minneapolis, MN 2006-07-31/08-04
    > Also for XML/XSLT/XSL-FO/UBL training: Varo,Denmark 06-09-25/10-06
    > World-wide corporate, govt. & user group UBL, XSL, & XML training.
    > G. Ken Holman                 mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com
    > Crane Softwrights Ltd.          http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/
    > Box 266, Kars, Ontario CANADA K0A-2E0    +1(613)489-0999 (F:-0995)
    > Male Cancer Awareness Aug'05  http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/bc
    > Legal business disclaimers:  http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal
    >
    >
    > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
    > generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
    > at:
    > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
    
    
    
    


    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]