OASIS Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) TC

 View Only

  • 1.  Version Control Commit by rusty

    Posted 02-12-2014 03:13
    Author: rusty Date: 2014-02-12 03:13:44 +0000 (Wed, 12 Feb 2014) New Revision: 231 Web View: https://tools.oasis-open.org/version-control/browse/wsvn/virtio/?rev=231&sc=1 Modified: content.tex introduction.tex Log: C struct specifications. Explicitly specify that our C struct specifications are without padding, and add some definitions for our integer data types. [ Rusty - added /* comments */ and removed redundant old le* explanation ] Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>


  • 2.  Re: [virtio] Version Control Commit by rusty

    Posted 02-12-2014 11:31
    On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 03:13:45 +0000 (UTC) workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org wrote: > Author: rusty > Date: 2014-02-12 03:13:44 +0000 (Wed, 12 Feb 2014) > New Revision: 231 > Web View: https://tools.oasis-open.org/version-control/browse/wsvn/virtio/?rev=231&sc=1 > > Modified: > content.tex > introduction.tex > Log: > C struct specifications. > > Explicitly specify that our C struct specifications are without padding, > and add some definitions for our integer data types. > > [ Rusty - added /* comments */ and removed redundant old le* explanation ] > > Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> > Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Shouldn't that also contain the removal of the __packed__ annotations where not needed? Confused.


  • 3.  Re: [virtio] Version Control Commit by rusty

    Posted 02-13-2014 04:57
    Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> writes: > On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 03:13:45 +0000 (UTC) > workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org wrote: > >> Author: rusty >> Date: 2014-02-12 03:13:44 +0000 (Wed, 12 Feb 2014) >> New Revision: 231 >> Web View: https://tools.oasis-open.org/version-control/browse/wsvn/virtio/?rev=231&sc=1 >> >> Modified: >> content.tex >> introduction.tex >> Log: >> C struct specifications. >> >> Explicitly specify that our C struct specifications are without padding, >> and add some definitions for our integer data types. >> >> [ Rusty - added /* comments */ and removed redundant old le* explanation ] >> >> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> >> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> > > Shouldn't that also contain the removal of the __packed__ annotations > where not needed? Confused. It should. Please apply a patch on top :) Thanks, Rusty.


Related Content