No objections from me.. I think the formatting suggestion is a good start
and then we should all take some stabs at adding definitions we find to be
relevant. After a gathering phase we can then enter a refining phase of the
glossary. But first we need to start gathering or defining our relevant
terms.
Dan Gisolfi
To: Dan Gisolfi/Somers/IBM@IBMUS, <wscm@lists.oasis-open.org>
cc:
Subject: RE: [wscm] Motion for a WSIA Glossary of Terms
Dan -
Looks like we can and probably should reuse some of the formatting and
glossary entries you have found. I was wondering if we should check some
of
the other TC's to see if we can gather additional items that may help
provide a wider set of definitions. I believe I saw some references to the
terms producer/consumer within some of the documents from the XACML.
Unless
there are objections, I will try and see if I can get some defs out of
their
docs relating to the p/c clarification.