MHonArc v2.5.2 -->
wsia message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [wsia][wsia-requirements][R130]
The first time I read it, as if I had never read it, and it sounded
really strange. Then I read it knowing what we mean and did not have
a problem and I could abide it regardless because I already know what
it means. I'm not sure someone reading it for the first time will
grasp the notion that a consumer can consume an exclusively stateful
or stateless service, as well as both. And didn't we have correct in
the first version, that the Consumer consumes the service not the
Producer? (though I understand that if they are well seasoned....
Oops, sorry, sense of humor alert!)
Suggestion:
This specification MUST allow a WSIA Consumer to consume
stateful-only WSIA Services, stateless-only WSIA Services, or both.
Ciao,
Rex
At 4:37 PM -0400 5/15/02, Rich Thompson wrote:
>Originally:
>
> A Consumer should be able to consume both a stateful WSIA Web Service
> and a stateless one. If needed, this specification should define the
> mechanism that allows the Consumer to support both cases.
>
>
> Rewrite as one simple requirement: SR, RT, MM, TC, GT. Do not use
> "session", no recursive "lifecycle" definitions - instead "for the
> duration of..". Allow for Consumers that consume only stateful or
> stateless services.
>
>
>
>
>
> How about:
>
>
> This specification MUST allow a Consumer to consume only stateful
> WSIA Producers, only stateless WSIA Producers or both.
>
>
>
>
>
> The comment may have implied combining in R129 - 131, but I have no
> clear recollection of that intent.
>
>
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------
>To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
>manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
--
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC