MHonArc v2.5.2 -->
wsia message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [wsia] OASIS-W3C relationships for WSIA
Title: RE: [wsia] OASIS-W3C relationships for
WSIA
I concur. I have followed the discussion of XMLP on xml-dev and
it has fizzled for lack of controversy or specifics I imagine, but it
may solve the one aspect of Web Services for which I have yet to find
the appropriate forum, mainly that we need a way to pre-secure the
channels for a set of services or at least check them and make sure
that the channels are open and available for transmission before a
full session is engaged. For the simplest embedded, or fire-and-forget
use cases from wsia producers it is not a problem, but onward from
that point it becomes problematic in a range from minor to
absolute.
Ciao,
Rex
At 10:07 AM -0500 4/4/02, Eilon Reshef wrote:
I would add XMLP, just in case we have some
requirements around transport of HTML documents, around
meta-definitions and interface support, etc.
-----Original Message-----
From: Charles F Wiecha [mailto:wiecha@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 9:49 AM
To: wsia@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [wsia] OASIS-W3C relationships for WSIA
Folks -- here's my draft response to Karl
around potential liaison
relationships between WSIA and W3C...please post any
comments or
suggestions for additions. I need to get back to him
later on today.
Thanks, Charlie
----------------------------------------------
Karl -- in addition to the Web Services
Architecture WG, it would be useful
for WSIA to have relationships with the following W3C
working groups and
activities:. (1) XFORMS, (2) on-going work around
XLINK or other approaches
to separating linking from documents, and XPOINTER,
(3) XPATH, and (5)
multimodal interaction.
Our work will draw more broadly from other
working groups, such as Schema,
SOAP, DOM, HTML and so on, but we can probably track
those groups without
the need for a more formal liaison
relationship.
Charlie Wiecha
-----Original Message-----
From: Karl F. Best [mailto:karl.best@oasis-open.org]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 11:20 AM
To: chairs
Subject: [chairs] relations with W3C
Chairs:
The managements of OASIS and of W3C have
been in conversation the last
couple of months about how the two organizations could
better be working
together. As part of our discussions W3C has asked for
specific problems
or concerns that should be addressed.
In preparation for our next meeting at the
end of next week I would like
to hear from any of the OASIS TCs that now have or
could have a liaison
relationship with a W3C working group or activity, or
whose technical
work in some way overlaps or relates to their
work.
Please let me know what specific issues
your TC may have including but
not limited to obstacles to working together,
divergent goals, IP
issues, scheduling issues, what groups you need to
work with, etc.
</karl>
=================================================================
Karl F. Best
OASIS - Director, Technical Operations
+1 978.667.5115 x206
karl.best@oasis-open.org http://www.oasis-open.org
----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the
subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC