MHonArc v2.5.2 -->
wsia message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [wsrp-interfaces] [wsia][wsia-wsrp joint interfaces] Some ideas
Eilon,
For configuration, I view there being a separate step for doing the
customization. For instance, in the 0.22 draft,
I envision setting properties on the entityContext to be act of configuring
the entity. As an example, a consumer
may configure a stock quote producer to display a quote for a specific
ticker - say IBM using the Reuter's service
may always ask for an IBM quote.
For adaptation (or what we've been calling Customization - we can reject
this change if it causes more confusion
instead of less), I view it as being customization during the use of the
service. In the 0.22 draft with the changes I
proposed, I envision setting properties on one or more property buckets in
the requestContext to be the act of
adapting the entity. As an example, a consumer may provide a number of
stocks and purchase price to the
stock quote producer to get an additional "gain/loss" column with the quote
- say IBM providing information
about an employee's stock options and strike price to show them how much
they're making on their options.
This can be done for instance, via additional properties in the Action
state property bucket of the requestContext.
The producer would specify the names for these properties and the consumer
would create and set the
appropriate values in the requestContext before invoking getMarkup.
I hope I'm being clear.
Regards,
shankar
____________________________________________________
Shankar Ramaswamy, PhD shankar4@us.ibm.com
Senior Software Engineer (919) 254-1072/TL 444
WebSphere Portal fax: (919)
486-0872
Eilon Reshef
<eilon.reshef@webc To: Shankar Ramaswamy/Pittsburgh/IBM@IBMUS, wsrp-interfaces@lists.oasis-open.org,
ollage.com> wsia@lists.oasis-open.org
cc:
07/29/2002 01:25 Subject: RE: [wsrp-interfaces] [wsia][wsia-wsrp joint interfaces] Some ideas
PM
Can you elaborate on how you see the difference between (3) and (4) in the
definitions below?
-----Original Message-----
From: Shankar Ramaswamy [mailto:shankar4@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 11:54 AM
To: wsrp-interfaces@lists.oasis-open.org; wsia@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [wsrp-interfaces] [wsia][wsia-wsrp joint interfaces] Some
ideas
In the paragraphs below, I have tried to summarize my understanding
of
where we are with respect to the Joint interface
and have made some suggestions for modifying draft 0.22 to better
meet the
requirements. Forgive my ignorance if some
of what I'm proposing has already been discussed in a forum where I
was
absent.
Definitions:
1. Service: represents one or more logical functions.
2. Entity: represents a single logical function within a service.
Every
service has at least one entity.
3. Configuration: is one process by which the consumer customizes the
behavior of an entity. Configuration is performed via a distinct
step separate from the normal use of the entity (usually prior
to
first use of the entity, but could be done at intermediate stages as
well).
Configuration may need to be done each time the consumer connects
to
the producer service and uses the entity or alternately, the
producer service can permanently remember the configured entity.
4. Adaptation (I thought I'd propose this new term as opposed to the
current use of customization because configuration is also a type of
customization): is another process by which the consumer
customizes the
behavior of an entity. Adaptation involves customization by the
consumer that is integrated with normal use of the entity.
5. State: this is information specific to and required by a producer
entity
implementation in order to work correctly ? the consumer has a
responsibility to co-operate with the producer in this regard;
the
degree of responsibility can vary as described below. The producer
entity
is responsible for creating and maintaining the state. Depending
on the
type of state (types listed below), if required, the producer may
also
elect to store the state. If the producer does not do so, this
poses
additional responsibilities on the consumer. Also, note that the
state
itself
can be completely opaque to the consumer or alternately, the
producer
may elect to describe some of it to allow the consumer to manipulate
the state for Adaptation purposes. The categories of state are
(following Mike Freedman's classification):
a. Navigational state
b. Session state
c. Action state
d. Request state
6. Context: this is information supplied by the consumer to the
producer
that is independent of any specific producer entity and has to do
with
issues like security, user agent characteristics, device
characteristics, user identity, etc.
7. Property: a name, type, value triplet. All information shared
between
consumer and producer is via lists of such properties.
Typical lifecycle:
1. Consumer finds one or more producer services via UDDI or other
means. At
this stage, consumer could also discover the set of entities offered
by the service or it could come at a later stage. (Could be
skipped if
consumer has previously connected).
2. Consumer connects to service.
3. Consumer discovers the set of entities offered by a service.
(Could be
skipped if consumer already knows about entities from Step 1 or a
previous connection)
4. Consumer connects to one or more entities.
5. Consumer configures the entities. (Could be skipped if consumer
used
persistent handles from a previous connection in Step 4)
6. Consumer uses the entities, adapting their behavior if desired.
There is some disconnect/destroy type stuff which is missing,
but
should be easy to figure that out.
API:
1. Connecting to a service: draft 0.22 does a good job.
2. Connecting to and configuring an entity: draft 0.22 does a
good
job except:
a. It has nothing for discovering entities ? should we
have
something for this or postpone for post 1.0 ?
b. It does not have the notion of a defaultEntity ? this
would
be very useful for services with a single entity. Consumers can
simply ask for the defaultEntity without doing
anything
else.
3. Using and adapting the entities: draft 0.22 seems a bit
complicated. I propose the following:
a. Let requestContext be hierarchically structured into
buckets, for example:
i. Navigational state
ii. Session state
iii. Action state
iv. Request state
v. Security context
vi. User agent identity
vii. User identity
viii. Device identity
ix. etc.
b. Each bucket above would have its own set of
properties. For
some buckets, the set of allowable properties could be
standardized across services ? for example, for
things like
security and user identity. For other buckets, some properties
could be standardized while others can be producer
service/entity specific. For example, we may have a standard property
called "session_handle" in the session
state
bucket, but there may be other session related properties in the
bucket
that a
producer could expose to allow for adaptation. The
nice
thing is that the producer can select any buckets for exposing
properties, allowing for various types of
adaptations.
c. We can also have an extensible set of buckets ? the
standard
can specify a set (which itself can evolve) as well as allow
producers to add their own buckets.
d. Let us do away with the interactionResponse and
instead
replace it with requestContext ? i.e. the producer may modify the
requestContext when processing an interaction. This
way,
the consumer can further modify it for adaptation purposes before
calling getMarkup.
e. We can impose responsibilities on the consumer wrt the
requestContext. This way, we can cover the cases when producer
does not want to store any information ? they can
include
it in the requestContext and make the consumer responsible for
storage.
Regards,
shankar
____________________________________________________
Shankar Ramaswamy, PhD shankar4@us.ibm.com
Senior Software Engineer (919) 254-1072/TL
444
WebSphere Portal fax: (919)
486-0872
----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC