MHonArc v2.5.2 -->
wsia message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [wsia] Re: RE: [wsrp] Sessions and Transient Entities
Let's defer the discussion on whether the consumer knows of the producer's
preferences to the F2F but let's try to come to an agreement that the
consumer can create multiple sessions and let the remote portlets share
data by letting them share the same session. In one extreme there would be
one session per user per producer, in the other extreme there would be one
session per user per remote portlet.
Best regards
Carsten Leue
-------
Dr. Carsten Leue
Dept.8288, IBM Laboratory B�blingen , Germany
Tel.: +49-7031-16-4603, Fax: +49-7031-16-4401
|---------+---------------------------->
| | Rich |
| | Thompson/Watson/I|
| | BM@IBMUS |
| | |
| | 06/12/2002 06:27 |
| | PM |
| | Please respond to|
| | Rich Thompson |
| | |
|---------+---------------------------->
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| |
| To: wsia@lists.oasis-open.org, wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org |
| cc: |
| Subject: [wsia] Re: RE: [wsrp] Sessions and Transient Entities |
| |
| |
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
I would agree that supporting explicit creation of sessions is easy means
for a Consumer to indicate an arbitrary grouping that it would like to
establish. As the Producer is ultimately managing the sessions, it can
always enforce whatever policies it would like on these groupings. I would
recommend that this version of the spec not try and define how a Producer
could expose such policies to the Consumer, though we may want to revisit
this question for future versions of the spec if scenarios are defined that
demonstrate value to the Consumer in knowing the Producer's policies.
"MICHAEL.FREEDMAN"
<MICHAEL.FREEDMAN@ To:
wsia@lists.oasis-open.org, wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org
oracle.com> cc:
Subject: Re: RE: [wsrp]
Sessions and Transient Entities
06/12/2002 10:58
AM
Irs not so much a bother to allow rather its a no reason to prevent. If a
consumer wants to support such a thing they should be free to do so as this
would allow arbitrary groupings (from the perspective of the producer).
-Mike-
face="Trebuchet MS" color=#0000ff>If a simple group-id within the
portlet UI
takes care of the issue (which I agree with), why bother to allow the
Consumer
to create and manage sessions explicitly (versus implicit creation by
the
Producer)?
class=122592900-12062002>
class=122592900-12062002>