MHonArc v2.5.2 -->

















wsia message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [Elist Home]








Subject: RE: [wsia][wsia-requirements][R905 and 601]




From: Rex Brooks <rexb@starbourne.com>
To: Rich Thompson <richt2@us.ibm.com>, wsia@lists.oasis-open.org
Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 12:05:43 -0700






Thanks, Rich,

That gives me something to think about. I hadn't considered it from 
that particular viewpoint. I am going to give it some more thought.

Ciao,
Rex

At 1:48 PM -0400 5/22/02, Rich Thompson wrote:
>I think all these levels are appropriate at times:
>
>    - Requirements on the specification: Guidelines for the TC as it writes
>    the spec.
>    - Requirements on Producers & Consumers: Processing models and semantics
>    - Requirements on artifacts: Restrictions on the artifacts that are
>    exchanged as part of the protocol.
>
>Some requirements have implications on all of these levels. This particular
>one places requirements on an artifact (eg. Presentation Fragments), on the
>TC (eg. minimal restrictions on markup types) and Producers/Consumers (eg.
>setting & processing whatever the spec defines as the standard means to
>achieve unique tokens).
>
>
> 
>                                                                                                                  
>                       "Monica 
>Martin"                                                                              
>                       <mmartin@certivo.        To:       "Rex 
>Brooks" <rexb@starbourne.com>, Rich                  
>                       net> 
>Thompson/Watson/IBM@IBMUS, <wsia@lists.oasis-open.org>             
> 
>cc:                                                                 
>                       05/22/2002 01:20         Subject:  RE: 
>[wsia][wsia-requirements][R905 and 601]               
> 
>PM                                                                                           
> 
>                                                                                                                  
> 
>                                                                                                                  
>
>
>
>This gets back to my question today.  Is the use of "specification" to
>mean the WSIA Web Service.  What can a specification do?  Perhaps the
>answer is "Provide the capability for xx to do yy."
>
>Thanks, Rex.
>Monica
>
>