MHonArc v2.5.2 -->





















wsia message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [Elist Home]








Subject: Re: [wsrp-interfaces] [wsia][wsia-wsrp joint interfaces] Better n	amefor 'Transparent State'?




From: Ravi Konuru <rkonuru@us.ibm.com>
To: wsia@lists.oasis-open.org, wsrp-interfaces@lists.oasis-open.org
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2002 15:31:55 -0400







To me, Published and Declared have a static ring. Public does not automatically mean interpretable.


Here are a few to think about:


Interpretable State

Customizable State

Modifiable State

Properties



Ravi Konuru

eBusiness Tools and Frameworks, IBM Research

office: 914-784-7180, tieline 8-863-7180; fax -3804

Rich Thompson/Watson/IBM@IBMUS













Rich Thompson/Watson/IBM@IBMUS
08/01/2002 02:29 PM





	

	To:	wsia@lists.oasis-open.org, wsrp-interfaces@lists.oasis-open.org

	cc:	

	Subject:	[wsrp-interfaces] [wsia][wsia-wsrp joint interfaces] Better n	ame for 'Transparent State'?


       




The term "transparent state" has generated a number of requests for

clarification about its meaning. This is being used in the draft spec to

describe that portion of an entity's state being published in a manner that

allows Consumers to programmatically set its values. Candidates that spring

to mind include:


Published State

Declared State

Public State


Do people find any of these better ... have other suggestions??




----------------------------------------------------------------

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription

manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>


















[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [Elist Home]


  









Powered by eList eXpress LLC