MHonArc v2.5.2 -->
















wsia message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [Elist Home]








Subject: RE: [wsia][wsia-requirements][R414]




From: Rich Thompson <richt2@us.ibm.com>
To: wsia@lists.oasis-open.org
Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 14:53:43 -0400







I agree, but the difference is whether it is good practice for the Consumer
to observe the Producer's types and constraints (eliminate round trips that
are guaranteed to fail) or whether a Consumer must run validation in order
to conform to the specification. I think we mean the former ....


                                                                                                                 
                      Alan Kropp                                                                                 
                      <akropp@epicentri        To:       Rich Thompson/Watson/IBM@IBMUS,                         
                      c.com>                    wsia@lists.oasis-open.org                                        
                                               cc:                                                               
                      05/06/2002 12:50         Subject:  RE: [wsia][wsia-requirements][R414]                     
                      PM                                                                                         
                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                 



I'm a little uncomfortable with suggesting to the Consumer that it is
possible for them to ignore Producer validation constraints.
Operationally,
this cannot be expected to lead to good QOS.

I completely agree that the Consumer MAY specify additional validation
constraints.