I have reviewed the document and have some comments: 1. The document looks like valid RDF, but it contains resources that correspond to multiple resources. The document base is
http://docs.open-services.net/oslc-promcode/shape/ and the shape for ManagedItem is
http://docs.open-services.net/oslc-promcode/shape/ManagedItem . Similarly, the shape for ManagedItemCollection is
http://docs.open-services.net/oslc-promcode/shape/ManagedItemCollection . This are two different information resources so they should be in different documents. To make these dereferencable (like the vocabulary) we'll have to decide on where to host them, e.g. the wiki, the document db, etc. That will determine the URL we can use. 2. There are errors involving Value-type and Range. Value-type corresponds to the property oslc:valueType which should only be used for datatype properties, i.e. properties that have literal values. Range corresponds to the property oslc:range which should only be used for object properties, i.e. properties whose value is a URI. 3. There are typos, e.g. in ManagedItemCollection oslc_promcode:belongsTo has Value-type xsd:dateTime and unspecified Range. It should have unspecified Value-type and Range oslc_promcode:Project. 4. The Read-only and Rep. columns are always unspecified, so let's drop them from the tables. I think it would be useful to go through the resource shape during the telecon and correct the errors. Regards, ___________________________________________________________________________ Arthur Ryman, PhD Chief Data Officer, Rational Chief Architect, Portfolio & Strategy Management Distinguished Engineer Master Inventor Academy of Technology Toronto Lab +1-905-413-3077 (office) +1-416-939-5063 (mobile)