Lightweight DITA SC

 View Only
  • 1.  Keydef's processing-role in XDITA map

    Posted 09-24-2018 19:39
    Dear LwDITA SC members, While Robert Anderson was helping me rename the new entity for topicref processing in the XDITA map grammar files, he noticed that keydef has a fixed role of "resource-only." Is this on purpose? Should it be fixed? Best, Carlos -- Carlos Evia, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Communication Virginia Tech Blacksburg, VA 24061-0112 (540)200-8201 Attachment: smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


  • 2.  Re: [dita-lightweight-dita] Keydef's processing-role in XDITA map

    Posted 09-24-2018 20:32
      |   view attached
    I'm honestly not sure of the answer on this one... In full DITA, <keydef> allows processing roles of both "normal" and "resource-only". It defaults to "resource-only" and it's possible nobody has ever changed the default. I noticed when helping fix up processing role here that in XDITA it only ever allows resource-only (that value is fixed). Not sure if that's intended as a way to prevent other uses, or just happened by some accident... Robert D. Anderson DITA-OT lead and Co-editor DITA 1.3 specification Marketing Services Center E-mail: robander@us.ibm.com 11501 BURNET RD,, TX, 78758-3400, AUSTIN, USA Carlos Evia ---09/24/2018 02:38:52 PM---Dear LwDITA SC members, While Robert Anderson was helping me rename the new entity for topicref From: Carlos Evia <cevia@vt.edu> To: dita-lightweight-dita@lists.oasis-open.org Date: 09/24/2018 02:38 PM Subject: [dita-lightweight-dita] Keydef's processing-role in XDITA map Sent by: <dita-lightweight-dita@lists.oasis-open.org> Dear LwDITA SC members, While Robert Anderson was helping me rename the new entity for topicref processing in the XDITA map grammar files, he noticed that keydef has a fixed role of "resource-only." Is this on purpose? Should it be fixed? Best, Carlos --  Carlos Evia, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Communication Virginia Tech Blacksburg, VA 24061-0112 (540)200-8201


  • 3.  Re: [dita-lightweight-dita] Keydef's processing-role in XDITA map

    Posted 09-24-2018 22:16
      |   view attached
    This might be a Michael Priestley question. I don't remember discussing this in meetings. But my opinion is that it should probably match DITA 1.3. Mark Giffin On 9/24/2018 1:32 PM, Robert D Anderson wrote: I'm honestly not sure of the answer on this one... In full DITA, <keydef> allows processing roles of both normal and resource-only . It defaults to resource-only and it's possible nobody has ever changed the default. I noticed when helping fix up processing role here that in XDITA it only ever allows resource-only (that value is fixed). Not sure if that's intended as a way to prevent other uses, or just happened by some accident... Robert D. Anderson DITA-OT lead and Co-editor DITA 1.3 specification Marketing Services Center E-mail: robander@us.ibm.com 11501 BURNET RD,, TX, 78758-3400, AUSTIN, USA Carlos Evia ---09/24/2018 02:38:52 PM---Dear LwDITA SC members, While Robert Anderson was helping me rename the new entity for topicref From: Carlos Evia <cevia@vt.edu> To: dita-lightweight-dita@lists.oasis-open.org Date: 09/24/2018 02:38 PM Subject: [dita-lightweight-dita] Keydef's processing-role in XDITA map Sent by: <dita-lightweight-dita@lists.oasis-open.org> Dear LwDITA SC members, While Robert Anderson was helping me rename the new entity for topicref processing in the XDITA map grammar files, he noticed that keydef has a fixed role of resource-only. Is this on purpose? Should it be fixed? Best, Carlos --  Carlos Evia, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Communication Virginia Tech Blacksburg, VA 24061-0112 (540)200-8201


  • 4.  Re: [dita-lightweight-dita] Keydef's processing-role in XDITA map

    Posted 09-25-2018 12:49
      |   view attached
    I don't remember that aspect of keydef being discussed either.  I did a search through all of the meeting minutes and the only thing that comes close is a mention of Alan working with the dtd and saying that " keydef had a lengthy set of attributes tied to it", and that he "asked for another set of eyes to look over his work to ensure that what he pruned was appropriate. "  So no specific decision on keydef defaulting to resource-only was ever made, and it may well be inadvertent. Cheers!   - Keith Schengili-Roberts Market Researcher and DITA Evangelist   IXIASOFT  825 Querb es, Suite 200, Montréal, Québec, Canada, H2V 3X1 tel   + 1 514 279-4942   /  toll free  + 1 877 279-4942   robertsk@ixiasoft.com   /  www.ixiasoft.com From: dita-lightweight-dita@lists.oasis-open.org <dita-lightweight-dita@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Mark Giffin <mark@markgiffin.com> Sent: September 24, 2018 6:16:17 PM To: dita-lightweight-dita@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [dita-lightweight-dita] Keydef's processing-role in XDITA map   This might be a Michael Priestley question. I don't remember discussing this in meetings. But my opinion is that it should probably match DITA 1.3. Mark Giffin On 9/24/2018 1:32 PM, Robert D Anderson wrote: I'm honestly not sure of the answer on this one... In full DITA, <keydef> allows processing roles of both "normal" and "resource-only". It defaults to "resource-only" and it's possible nobody has ever changed the default. I noticed when helping fix up processing role here that in XDITA it only ever allows resource-only (that value is fixed). Not sure if that's intended as a way to prevent other uses, or just happened by some accident... Robert D. Anderson DITA-OT lead and Co-editor DITA 1.3 specification Marketing Services Center E-mail: robander@us.ibm.com 11501 BURNET RD,, TX, 78758-3400, AUSTIN, USA Carlos Evia ---09/24/2018 02:38:52 PM---Dear LwDITA SC members, While Robert Anderson was helping me rename the new entity for topicref From: Carlos Evia <cevia@vt.edu> To: dita-lightweight-dita@lists.oasis-open.org Date: 09/24/2018 02:38 PM Subject: [dita-lightweight-dita] Keydef's processing-role in XDITA map Sent by: <dita-lightweight-dita@lists.oasis-open.org> Dear LwDITA SC members, While Robert Anderson was helping me rename the new entity for topicref processing in the XDITA map grammar files, he noticed that keydef has a fixed role of "resource-only." Is this on purpose? Should it be fixed? Best, Carlos --  Carlos Evia, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Communication Virginia Tech Blacksburg, VA 24061-0112 (540)200-8201