UBL Pre-Award Procurement Subcommittee

 View Only

RE: [ubl-pre-award] Changes while incorporating constructs

  • 1.  RE: [ubl-pre-award] Changes while incorporating constructs

    Posted 09-11-2017 18:21
    At 2017-09-07 19:42 +0000, Enric Staromiejski Torregrosa wrote: I like the new definition, but allow me to try and improve it just a bit (and to be consistent with the rest of the naming) : " A URI value used as a reply to the tendering criterion property". (Remember that we replaced "requirement" with "property"). Looking at the ResponseValue ABIE in the pre-award 06 spreadsheet I see the following definitions: A class to describe the criterion requirement response value. An identifier to refer to the crterion requirement response value. A description of the response value to the criterion requirement. A text or name used as a reply to the criterion requirement. An amount used as a reply to the criterion requirement. A binary graphic, picture, sound or video object used as a reply to the criterion requirement. A code used as a reply to the criterion requirement. A date used as a reply to the criterion requirement. An identifier used as a reply to the criterion requirement. An indicator used as a reply to the criterion requirement. A measure used as a reply to the criterion requirement. A number, rate or percent used as a reply to the criterion requirement. A quantity used as a reply to the criterion requirement. A time used as a reply to the criterion requirement. A URI value used as a reply to the criterion requirement. I composed the last definition pattered according to the other definitions. Should all definitions be modified as you suggest? . . . . . . . Ken -- Contact info, blog, articles, etc. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/ Check our site for free XML, XSLT, XSL-FO and UBL developer resources Streaming hands-on XSLT/XPath 2 training class @ US$45 (5 hours free)