OASIS Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) TC

 View Only

Re: [cti] Motions for STIX and TAXII

  • 1.  Re: [cti] Motions for STIX and TAXII

    Posted 04-25-2017 18:35
    I second the creation of these three ballots.   Sarah Kelley Senior Cyber Threat Analyst Multi-State Information Sharing and Analysis Center (MS-ISAC)                    31 Tech Valley Drive East Greenbush, NY 12061   sarah.kelley@cisecurity.org 518-266-3493 24x7 Security Operations Center SOC@cisecurity.org  - 1-866-787-4722                          From: <cti@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Bret Jordan <Bret_Jordan@symantec.com> Date: Tuesday, April 25, 2017 at 2:32 PM To: "cti@lists.oasis-open.org" <cti@lists.oasis-open.org> Subject: [cti] Motions for STIX and TAXII   All,   NOTE: These are three separate ballots.     I move that the CTI TC approve STIX 2.0 WD02 and all associated artifacts packaged together in https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=60594&wg_abbrev=cti  as a Committee Specification Draft, and designate the Word version of the specification as authoritative. I further move that the CTI TC approve submitting the resulting CSD for 15 days of public review. The public comment log for the first public review period is uploaded here: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=60593&wg_abbrev=cti     I move that the CTI TC approve TAXII 2.0 WD01 and all associated artifacts packaged together in https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=60598&wg_abbrev=cti  as a Committee Specification Draft, and designate the Word version of the specification as authoritative. I further move that the CTI TC approve submitting the resulting CSD for 30 days of public review.     I move that the CTI TC open a ballot on the following question: “Should the TC proceed with the development of the merged ‘comment’ object to capture all notes and opinions (the use cases from the previously developed intel note and opinion objects)? A vote of ‘yes’ means the TC will proceed with the comment object, a vote of ‘no’ means the TC will proceed with the separate intel note and opinion objects. https://docs.google.com/document/d/15qD9KBQcVcY4FlG9n_VGhqacaeiLlNcQ7zVEjc8I3b4/edit#heading=h.s9c08p1vu5u1       Bret     ... This message and attachments may contain confidential information. If it appears that this message was sent to you by mistake, any retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message and attachments is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the message and any attachments. . . .