Hi Rich,
I like the idea. I believe that usability for machines would
be one of the important keys for it to fly.
I mean machine access to the repository, in particular, search capability.
It is also important, I believe, to consider if/how to deal with versioning. Nothing stays the same forever.
Regards,
Ryu
From:
cti@lists.oasis-open.org <
cti@lists.oasis-open.org>
On Behalf Of Rich Piazza
Sent: Monday, July 6, 2020 11:58 PM
To:
cti@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [cti] Common repository for STIX CTI objects
Many entities in cyber threat intelligence are common and having many duplicate STIX objects to represent the same concept has always been seen as wasteful and problematic. Several decisions made
when writing the STIX specification tried to take this into account. This includes: specification defined instances of TLP data markings, kill chain phases referred to by their names and deterministic identifiers for STIX cyber objects (SCOs). However, having
an easily available repository of common CTI objects has always been on the wish list of members of the CTI-TC. DHS has tasked MITRE with investigating creating such a repository.
MITRE has already started a similar repository of STIX objects to represent both the ATT&CK and CAPEC frameworks. It is available at
https://github.com/mitre/cti .
It certainly is the case that other organizations might want to do something similar with their cyber threat intellectual property. However, there are other STIX objects that are general enough to be hosted in a common repository, defined once and re-used
by the broader STIX community. Such a repository would foster consistency across STIX threat sharing efforts. In creating and using this repository, the amount of data transmitted over the wire could be reduced because only identifier references would need
to be shared.
Some of the objects types that immediately come to mind to include in this repository are locations (e.g., countries) and identities (e.g., industry sectors). Others types, like software (e.g., Microsoft
Word version x) or tools (e.g., RDP) might be useful. Objects like IP addresses, which already can be considered unique if using deterministic identifiers, could be stored in this repository, so they need not be shared. Vulnerability objects representing
each CVE could be housed there also. I m sure there are other objects that could be included.
There are many issues to be discussed as part of setting up such a repository:
Where would it be hosted? It is envisioned that it could be available on the GitHub oasis-open web site, however this is just an initial suggestion.
How is the content stored? Is it fronted by a TAXII server?
Who maintains it? MITRE, DHS, OASIS ?
Who decides what should be in the repository? The maintainers, a CTI subcommittee?
Would the STIX community actually use this repository?
If you would like to be involved in making this happen, or just have some ideas, please get in touch.
We can have a kickoff discussion at a future working call.
Rich P.
--
Rich Piazza
Lead Cyber Security Engineer
The MITRE Corporation
781-271-3760