Sean, I think that's as good as we need for STIXv.1.2.1. It was always going to be a stop-gap, and I'm happy with the wording within that context. STIX v2.0 is where we will need to be more specific. Cheers Terry MacDonald STIX, TAXII, CybOX Consultant M: +61-407-203-026 E:
terry.macdonald@threatloop.com W:
www.threatloop.com Disclaimer: The opinions expressed within this email do not represent the sentiment of any other party except my own. My views do not necessarily reflect those of my employers. On 1 September 2015 at 04:56, Patrick Maroney <
Pmaroney@specere.org > wrote: re: What do you all think about spinning up a separate work product effort to look into the Profile representation and tooling issues? [+1] You can put me down as a volunteer for the STIX Profiles WG. Patrick Maroney President Integrated Networking Technologies, Inc. Office: (856)983-0001 Cell: (609)841-5104 Email:
pmaroney@specere.org From: <
cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org > on behalf of Sean Barnum Date: Monday, August 31, 2015 at 2:33 PM To: "
cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org " Subject: [cti-stix] Conformance clauses for the STIX specification documents What do you all think about spinning up a separate work product effort to look into the Profile representation and tooling issues?