All,
Based on the lack of dissent against the motion to accept the timestamp and timestamp precision properties by unanimous consent, I’ll be updating them in the pre-draft specification to indicate that they’re now in “working draft” status.
There are currently two open ballots to move other text forward to working draft status:
Identifier, closing 5/17 Custom Properties, closing 5/20
Please vote!
Also note a slight language tweak…where before we were using “draft”, I’m going to start using the term “working draft” to avoid terminology conflicts with the OASIS official concept of a draft. Same idea though…things that are approved as working draft
have received consensus and any substantive changes will require another approved motion to accept those changes.
Thanks,
John