This is fine, it would be a bug to leave the name in a singular form after converting it is an array. From:
sarif@lists.oasis-open.org <
sarif@lists.oasis-open.org> On Behalf Of Larry Golding (Comcast) Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2018 5:31 PM To:
sarif@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [sarif] run.invocation => run.invocations Now that run.invocation is an array of invocation objects, I would like to change the name of the property to run.invocations . Otherwise, it would be the only array-valued property in the specification with a singular name. Please let me know if there’s any objection. David , please let me know if you think this needs to be explicitly approved at the next TC. Thanks, Larry