OASIS Collaborative Automated Course of Action Operations (CACAO) for Cyber Secu

 View Only
  • 1.  Re: [cacao] Outstanding Ballots

    Posted 04-03-2020 15:39




    Jason as we have a rev to the requirements doc to add, then maybe that s what we do.
     
    Originally the terminology was part of the requirements doc and pulled out as a separate reference in the belief that it will be referenced by other docs also.
     
    If the TC agree its best to just add to the requirements doc then the next rev can do that.
     

    Allan Thomson
    CTO ( +1-408-331-6646)

    LookingGlass Cyber Solutions
     

    From: Jason Keirstead <Jason.Keirstead@ca.ibm.com>
    Date: Friday, April 3, 2020 at 8:37 AM
    To: Allan Thomson <athomson@lookingglasscyber.com>
    Cc: "cacao@lists.oasis-open.org" <cacao@lists.oasis-open.org>, "rx118r@att.com" <rx118r@att.com>
    Subject: RE: [cacao] Outstanding Ballots


     





    THIS EMAIL ORIGINATES FROM OUTSIDE OF LOOKINGGLASS







    I will admit freely - I did not even know there were two Notes at play here, that is why I only voted on one. I didn't see the other one and didn't know it existed
    until it was remarked the other day that it didn't pass.


     


    Looking at it, its an 11 page document with only a page of actual content (the other 10 pages are OASIS template) - why wasn't this just put in the 1 note on requirements?


     


    -
    Jason Keirstead
    Chief Architect - IBM Security Threat Management
    www.ibm.com/security

    "Would you like me to give you a formula for success? It's quite simple, really. Double your rate of failure."

    - Thomas J. Watson


     


     





  • 2.  Re: [cacao] Outstanding Ballots

    Posted 04-03-2020 16:48
    Further, as we have discussed in the past. The long term goal would be to fold the terminology back in to the specification document. But we wanted to have them be a CND for now, so that we can start all agreeing on the same usage of terms. So regardless of where they are used, we can all talk about them in the same way.  The idea of releasing CND ballots at this stage, as we talked on the last call, is not about setting these in stone, but rather setting the first fence posts.  Thanks, Bret PGP Fingerprint:  63B4 FC53 680A 6B7D 1447  F2C0 74F8 ACAE 7415 0050 Without cryptography vihv vivc ce xhrnrw, however, the only thing that can not be unscrambled is an egg. On Apr 3, 2020, at 9:39 AM, Allan Thomson < athomson@lookingglasscyber.com > wrote: Jason as we have a rev to the requirements doc to add, then maybe that s what we do.   Originally the terminology was part of the requirements doc and pulled out as a separate reference in the belief that it will be referenced by other docs also.   If the TC agree its best to just add to the requirements doc then the next rev can do that.   Allan Thomson CTO ( +1-408-331-6646) LookingGlass Cyber Solutions   From:   Jason Keirstead < Jason.Keirstead@ca.ibm.com > Date:   Friday, April 3, 2020 at 8:37 AM To:   Allan Thomson < athomson@lookingglasscyber.com > Cc:   cacao@lists.oasis-open.org < cacao@lists.oasis-open.org >, rx118r@att.com < rx118r@att.com > Subject:   RE: [cacao] Outstanding Ballots   THIS EMAIL ORIGINATES FROM OUTSIDE OF LOOKINGGLASS I will admit freely - I did not even know there were two Notes at play here, that is why I only voted on one. I didn't see the other one and didn't know it existed until   it was remarked the other day that it didn't pass.   Looking at it, its an 11 page document with only a page of actual content (the other 10 pages are OASIS template) - why wasn't this just put in the 1 note on requirements?   - Jason Keirstead Chief Architect - IBM Security Threat Management www.ibm.com/security Would you like me to give you a formula for success? It's quite simple, really. Double your rate of failure. - Thomas J. Watson