Thnx for the reply. I feared that might be the case. I'll harass the
package manager on mu Linux dist ;)
/Niels
On 05/29/18 15:55, stefan wrote:
>
>
> On 2018-05-29 08:27 AM, Niels Müller Larsen wrote:
>> Hi there
>>
>> Back in 2015 I had issues with missing bibliography entries. Bob
>> Stayton directed me towards using namespaced stylesheets, and that
>> solved the problem.
>>
>> Now, 2018, I think I read somewhere that the xsl-stylesheets-1.79.2
>> stylesheets were namespaced even though the -ns- from the name
>> disappeared.
>
> Quite a while ago I migrated the docbook-xsl repo from sourceforge to
> github (https://github.com/docbook/xslt10-stylesheets). Given that we
> had to change URLs anyhow, we took the opportunity to cleanup some
> other bits of logic, such as the relationship between namespace-aware
> vs. non-namespace-aware stylesheets.
>
> So any packages build from the new repo are namespace-aware by
> default, while the non-namespace-aware packages are generated and use
> the "nons" suffix in their name (see
>
https://github.com/docbook/xslt10-stylesheets/releases).>
> Unfortunately I don't think any official docbook-xsl release was ever
> built from the new repo, so I fear that all packages you can get from
> Linux distributions will all still be built from the old (and very
> outdated) sourceforge code.
>
>
>
>>
>> Some experiments with xsl-stylesheets-1.79.2-4 on my arch linux bring
>> back the missing biblipgraphy items. I am confused, can anyone
>> explain, please?
>>
>> /Niels
>>
>
>
> Stefan
>
> --
>
> ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...
>
>