docbook-apps

  • 1.  DocBook XSL 1.79.0 release is available

    Posted 10-15-2015 22:34
    I finally finished putting together a new release of the DocBook XSL
    stylesheets. I apologize for the long delay. Future releases should
    come more frequently as we move over to Github.

    You can download the distribution files from SourceForge:

    https://sourceforge.net/projects/docbook/files/docbook-xsl/1.79.0
    https://sourceforge.net/projects/docbook/files/docbook-xsl-ns/1.79.0
    https://sourceforge.net/projects/docbook/files/docbook-xsl-doc/1.79.0

    This is a "dot.zero" release, which means it should be considered a
    candidate release for testing. Please test this thoroughly if you can,
    and send any issues you find to me and I will correct them for the dot.1
    release.

    The major changes in this release are:

    - Support for most elements in the DocBook Publishers schema
    extension.

    - Support for some FOP 1.1 improvements.

    - Many bug fixes.


    --
    Bob Stayton
    Sagehill Enterprises
    bobs@sagehill.net



  • 2.  Re: [docbook-apps] DocBook XSL 1.79.0 release is available

    Posted 10-15-2015 23:14
    Hi Bob,

    thanks a bunch. I'm happy to hear about the move to Github.

    I missed that announcement. What is the current state of that move and the
    new repository location?

    Best regards, Lars

    2015-10-16 0:33 GMT+02:00 Bob Stayton <bobs@sagehill.net>:

    > I finally finished putting together a new release of the DocBook XSL
    > stylesheets. I apologize for the long delay. Future releases should come
    > more frequently as we move over to Github.
    >
    > You can download the distribution files from SourceForge:
    >
    > https://sourceforge.net/projects/docbook/files/docbook-xsl/1.79.0
    > https://sourceforge.net/projects/docbook/files/docbook-xsl-ns/1.79.0
    > https://sourceforge.net/projects/docbook/files/docbook-xsl-doc/1.79.0
    >
    > This is a "dot.zero" release, which means it should be considered a
    > candidate release for testing. Please test this thoroughly if you can, and
    > send any issues you find to me and I will correct them for the dot.1
    > release.
    >
    > The major changes in this release are:
    >
    > - Support for most elements in the DocBook Publishers schema
    > extension.
    >
    > - Support for some FOP 1.1 improvements.
    >
    > - Many bug fixes.
    >
    >
    > --
    > Bob Stayton
    > Sagehill Enterprises
    > bobs@sagehill.net
    >
    > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    > To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
    > For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-help@lists.oasis-open.org
    >
    >



  • 3.  Re: [docbook-apps] DocBook XSL 1.79.0 release is available

    Posted 10-15-2015 23:26
    Hi Lars,

    On 15.10.2015 19:14, Lars Vogel wrote:
    > Hi Bob,
    >
    > thanks a bunch. I'm happy to hear about the move to Github.
    >
    > I missed that announcement. What is the current state of that move and
    > the new repository location?

    While I'm not Bob, I think I may answer that question :-) :
    DocBook as organization is on github here: https://github.com/docbook
    The stylesheets are here: https://github.com/docbook/xslt10-stylesheets

    Note that things are still somewhat in flux; for example, the build
    system on the migrated repo doesn't quite work yet. Hopefully that will
    be fixed soon, so we can start contributing patches.

    Regards,
    Stefan

    --

    ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...




  • 4.  Re: [docbook-apps] DocBook XSL 1.79.0 release is available

    Posted 10-16-2015 06:10
    Hi,

    On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 19:25:51 -0400
    Stefan Seefeld <stefan@seefeld.name> wrote:

    > [... GitHub ...]
    > DocBook as organization

    Stefan, I fear your claim isn't completely right. :) Technically,
    DocBook isn't an organisation on GitHub, it's just a normal user named
    "DocBook". :)

    Shouldn't this be migrated to an organization instead of having a normal
    user? According to https://help.github.com/articles/about-organizations/

    About organizations
    Organizations are great for businesses and large open-source projects
    that need multiple owners and administrators, grouped together with
    teams that determine affinity and repository permissions.

    I'm not sure if this definition of "large open-source project" would fit
    for a (hypothetical) DocBook organization. However, maybe it would be
    beneficial to have one as it allows more fine-grained repository
    permissions? Not sure if that's a good thing for DocBook.

    Just my thoughts. :))


    --
    Gruß/Regards,
    Thomas Schraitle



  • 5.  Re: [docbook-apps] DocBook XSL 1.79.0 release is available

    Posted 10-16-2015 10:41
    On 16.10.2015 02:10, Thomas Schraitle wrote:
    > Hi,
    >
    > On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 19:25:51 -0400
    > Stefan Seefeld <stefan@seefeld.name> wrote:
    >
    >> [... GitHub ...]
    >> DocBook as organization
    > Stefan, I fear your claim isn't completely right. :) Technically,
    > DocBook isn't an organisation on GitHub, it's just a normal user named
    > "DocBook". :)

    I stand corrected. :-)

    >
    > Shouldn't this be migrated to an organization instead of having a normal
    > user? According to https://help.github.com/articles/about-organizations/
    >
    > About organizations
    > Organizations are great for businesses and large open-source projects
    > that need multiple owners and administrators, grouped together with
    > teams that determine affinity and repository permissions.
    >
    > I'm not sure if this definition of "large open-source project" would fit
    > for a (hypothetical) DocBook organization. However, maybe it would be
    > beneficial to have one as it allows more fine-grained repository
    > permissions? Not sure if that's a good thing for DocBook.
    >
    > Just my thoughts. :))

    Yes, I fully agree to the above.

    Stefan

    --

    ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...




  • 6.  Re: [docbook-apps] DocBook XSL 1.79.0 release is available

    Posted 10-30-2015 04:38
    Thanks Stefan for the answer. Really great news that DocBook is moving to
    Github.

    Best regards, Lars

    2015-10-16 1:25 GMT+02:00 Stefan Seefeld <stefan@seefeld.name>:

    > Hi Lars,
    >
    > On 15.10.2015 19:14, Lars Vogel wrote:
    > > Hi Bob,
    > >
    > > thanks a bunch. I'm happy to hear about the move to Github.
    > >
    > > I missed that announcement. What is the current state of that move and
    > > the new repository location?
    >
    > While I'm not Bob, I think I may answer that question :-) :
    > DocBook as organization is on github here: https://github.com/docbook
    > The stylesheets are here: https://github.com/docbook/xslt10-stylesheets
    >
    > Note that things are still somewhat in flux; for example, the build
    > system on the migrated repo doesn't quite work yet. Hopefully that will
    > be fixed soon, so we can start contributing patches.
    >
    > Regards,
    > Stefan
    >
    > --
    >
    > ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...
    >
    >
    > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    > To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
    > For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-help@lists.oasis-open.org
    >
    >



  • 7.  Re: [docbook-apps] DocBook XSL 1.79.0 release is available

    Posted 10-16-2015 06:07
    Hi Bob,

    On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 15:33:33 -0700
    Bob Stayton <bobs@sagehill.net> wrote:

    > I finally finished putting together a new release of the DocBook XSL
    > stylesheets. I apologize for the long delay. Future releases should
    > come more frequently as we move over to Github.

    Thanks a lot Bob for this effort! Great work!

    One question about contributing:
    Any bugs should be reported on GitHub now, right? Will the old bugs on
    SourceForge be migrated to GitHub?

    How to contribute? Is it ok to send pull-requests or would you prefer
    other forms?

    Ok, sorry, that was more than one question. ;))

    Thanks!

    --
    Gruß/Regards,
    Thomas Schraitle