Hi,
Norman Walsh wrote:
> As I work on porting the XSLT 1.0 stylesheets to XSLT 2.0, I find
> workarounds, mostly for FOP and PassiveTeX scattered throughout. Does
> anyone know if these are still necessary?
I had a look at the 1.73.2 stylesheets and can provide some details
about the workarounds still needed by the FOP 1.x branch (version 0.93
and later). Having found no development targetted list on Sourceforge
I guess this list is the appropriate one.
I worked from the released 1.73.2 version of the stylesheets. I made
a grep for ‘fop.extensions’ in the fo/*.xsl files and the line numbers
given below correspond to the lines where this term was found. If for
whatever reason the lines don’t match they can be retrieved by searching
for ‘fop.extensions’ from the beginning of each file.
There’s nothing to add that’s specific to the fop1.extensions parameter;
this means that, either the fop.extensions parameter is present at the
same place and the comment available for this parameter also applies to
the fop1 parameter. Or the specific behaviour that’s implemented at that
place must be kepts as is.
The results are in the attached text file. If there’s any question, just
ask.
I hope this helps,
Vincent
--
Vincent Hennebert Anyware Technologies
http://people.apache.org/~vhennebert http://www.anyware-tech.comApache FOP Committer FOP Development/Consulting