docbook-apps

  • 1.  Re: Syntax highlighting

    Posted 12-10-2013 14:50
    "Jan Tosovsky" <j.tosovsky@email.cz> writes:

    > On 2013-12-09 Norman Walsh wrote:
    >>
    >> ... future work on XSL FO has largely been abandoned.
    >
    > Does it mean that XSL-FO 2.0/next is not planned any more? Is there any
    > citation for this?

    http://www.w3.org/XML/XPPL/

    "This WOrking (sic) Group is no longer active, because of
    insufficient participation. The specifications are no longer
    maintained."

    Be seeing you,
    norm

    --
    Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Mankind are always happy for
    http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | having been happy; so that if you
    Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | make them happy now, you make them
    | happy twenty years hence by the
    | memory of it.--Sydney Smith



  • 2.  Re: [docbook-apps] Re: Syntax highlighting

    Posted 12-10-2013 15:14
    I think you mentioned exploring HTML+CSS for print a few days ago. Is
    that because FO might be at the end of it's road?

    Thanks!

    Peter

    On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
    > "Jan Tosovsky" <j.tosovsky@email.cz> writes:
    >
    >> On 2013-12-09 Norman Walsh wrote:
    >>>
    >>> ... future work on XSL FO has largely been abandoned.
    >>
    >> Does it mean that XSL-FO 2.0/next is not planned any more? Is there any
    >> citation for this?
    >
    > http://www.w3.org/XML/XPPL/
    >
    > "This WOrking (sic) Group is no longer active, because of
    > insufficient participation. The specifications are no longer
    > maintained."
    >
    > Be seeing you,
    > norm
    >
    > --
    > Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Mankind are always happy for
    > http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | having been happy; so that if you
    > Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | make them happy now, you make them
    > | happy twenty years hence by the
    > | memory of it.--Sydney Smith