I think you mentioned exploring HTML+CSS for print a few days ago. Is
that because FO might be at the end of it's road?
Thanks!
Peter
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Norman Walsh <
ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
> "Jan Tosovsky" <
j.tosovsky@email.cz> writes:
>
>> On 2013-12-09 Norman Walsh wrote:
>>>
>>> ... future work on XSL FO has largely been abandoned.
>>
>> Does it mean that XSL-FO 2.0/next is not planned any more? Is there any
>> citation for this?
>
>
http://www.w3.org/XML/XPPL/>
> "This WOrking (sic) Group is no longer active, because of
> insufficient participation. The specifications are no longer
> maintained."
>
> Be seeing you,
> norm
>
> --
> Norman Walsh <
ndw@nwalsh.com> | Mankind are always happy for
>
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | having been happy; so that if you
> Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | make them happy now, you make them
> | happy twenty years hence by the
> | memory of it.--Sydney Smith