Russell Seymour wrote:
> Camille,
>
> That worked brilliantly, thanks.
Great, actually I had never thought about it before, but I guess that's
something that could be generalized and possibly included by default in
the docbook XSL.
What's the others experience with this kind of requirement? (as a
replacement to SGML ENTITY...)
What system did you use? Xinclude?
Camille.
> Russell
>
> 2008/8/26 Russell Seymour <
russell.seymour@turtlesystems.co.uk></
russell.seymour@turtlesystems.co.uk>
> <mailto:
russell.seymour@turtlesystems.co.uk>>
>
> Camille,
>
> Thanks very much for the pointer. I will give it a go and let you
> know how it goes.
>
> Russell
>
>
>
> 2008/8/26 Camille Bégnis <
camille@neodoc.biz></
camille@neodoc.biz>
> <mailto:
camille@neodoc.biz>>
>
> Hi,
>
> yes that looks completely reasonable, you'd just need to
> decide what markup in the source XML would be used to hold the
> client name, for example <phrase role="xslparam"></phrase>
> vendor="output.client"/> (completely wild guess).
>
> and then define in your custom XSL the function that will
> match the above element and replace it with the content of the
> $output.client parameter....
>
> Hope that helps,
>
> Camille.
>
>
> Russell Seymour wrote:
>
> Good afternoon,
>
> I am starting to work with Docbook again after a long time
> of not using it.
>
> I am trying to find my feet again, and I am sure there is
> something that I used to do that I cannot work out how to
> do how so I am hoping you will be able to assist me.
>
> I would like to set a parameter on the command line that
> sets the client, e.g. --stringparam output.client "ACME"
> and then use the output.client within the Docbook markup
> and for ACME to be displayed in the final output.
>
> Is this possible or have I lost I completely lost the plot?
>
> Thanks, Russell
>
>
>
</mailto:
camille@neodoc.biz></mailto:
russell.seymour@turtlesystems.co.uk>