docbook-apps

Hello,

How does one insert

On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 2:28 AM, Mark Craig

Hello, thanks for your suggestion.

This is what I tried after I found user.footer.content only gets used when
chunking.

Trouble is, I can insert the file in the HTML following the instructions you
cite.

But either I get effectively "<script>" etc. in the HTML, using
<xinclude:include href="ga.txt" parse="text" />.
Or the HTML is okay but the build breaks generating PDF with <xinclude:include
href="ga.txt" />, because the FO specification has never heard of

Hello again,

Well... this seems to work, though it doesn't feel right. I put this as one
of the tasks for the maven-antrun-plugin of the POM:

<replace dir='${basedir}/target/docbkx/html/' token=
'</body>'>

<include name='**/**/*.html' />

<replacevalue><script type="text/javascript">


var _gaq = _gaq || [];

_gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-********-*']);

_gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);


(function() {

var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript';
ga.async = true;

ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : '
http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js';

var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);

})();


</script></body></replacevalue>

</replace>

It would be cool if there were something like user.footer.content that
worked without chunking.

Regards,
Mark

On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Mark Craig

I've never used docbkx-tools, maybe I'm misunderstanding your
publishing process. I'm surprised that a customization for HTML has
any effect on your FO.

Peter

On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Mark Craig

Hello Peter,

It's not actually a customization for HTML specifically. Maybe I need to
reread the docs?

When I include the Google Analytics script in the document with XInclude,
the resulting content is in the source. Then the docbkx-tools Maven plugin
runs HTML, EPUB, PDF, RTF, and man page generation on the source.

Regards,
Mark

On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Peter Desjardins <peter.desjardins.us@
gmail.com> wrote:

> I've never used docbkx-tools, maybe I'm misunderstanding your
> publishing process. I'm surprised that a customization for HTML has
> any effect on your FO.
>
> Peter
>
> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Mark Craig

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

It appears he was using an xinclude to pull in the script (rather than a
processing instruction as suggested in Bob's book). The xinclude will be
resolved for all formats, so would break fo. The PI however would be
ignored/discarded by the fo xsls.

David

On 05/19/2011 10:12 AM, Peter Desjardins wrote:
> I've never used docbkx-tools, maybe I'm misunderstanding your
> publishing process. I'm surprised that a customization for HTML has
> any effect on your FO.
>
> Peter
>
> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Mark Craig

Aha, . I'll try that.

Regards,
Mark

On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 5:20 PM, David Cramer <david@thingbag.net> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> It appears he was using an xinclude to pull in the script (rather than a
> processing instruction as suggested in Bob's book). The xinclude will be
> resolved for all formats, so would break fo. The PI however would be
> ignored/discarded by the fo xsls.
>
> David
>
> On 05/19/2011 10:12 AM, Peter Desjardins wrote:
> > I've never used docbkx-tools, maybe I'm misunderstanding your
> > publishing process. I'm surprised that a customization for HTML has
> > any effect on your FO.
> >
> > Peter
> >
> > On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Mark Craig

Thanks very much for insistingm Peter and David. That's much better.

Regards,
Mark

On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Mark Craig