docbook-apps

  • 1.  Re: Fw: [docbook-apps] Namespace issues with titlepage templates in slides

    Posted 05-10-2013 16:01
    On 8.5.2013 7:19, Bob Stayton wrote:

    > Would have time to take a look at this? It seems Alexey spent a
    > great deal of time sorting out the namespace issues for the DocBook
    > titlepage template system, and has proposed many improvements. As
    > far as I can tell, they make sense, but I think you should look at
    > it.

    Sure, I originally skipped message as from subject line I got impression
    it's related to slides only.

    > This issue, however, shows that the titlepage.xsl is not not fully
    > namespace aware. First, it shouldn't "autoguess" the namespace for
    > t:wrapper - instead, it should just discover the namespace referred
    > to by the t:wrapper attribute.

    Autoguessing is here just for backward compatibility. Ideally namespace
    should be passed by ns parameter. Problems you have seen in slides
    titlepages are caused by missing ns parameter in the build script.

    > Attached patches deal with these issues:

    Thanks for the patches. There are many good ideas in your code, but I'm
    little bit worried about backward compatibility -- in past we have tried
    very hard to keep old titlepage templates to work with newer versions of
    stylesheets. I'm not sure whether this is still true with all your
    proposed changes.

    Also what's not clear to me is whether your patch will work with non-ns
    version of stylesheets which is primarily targeted for DocBook V4.x.
    Your code has several tests for DocBook namespace which suggests that
    you target only ns version of stylesheets.

    For example how titlepage will look like for for HTML (not XHTML, so no
    namespace) for non-ns stylesheets (DocBook V4.x, again no namespace)?

    Thanks,

    Jirka

    --
    ------------------------------------------------------------------
    Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz http://xmlguru.cz
    ------------------------------------------------------------------
    Professional XML consulting and training services
    DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
    ------------------------------------------------------------------
    OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 rep.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------
    Bringing you XML Prague conference http://xmlprague.cz
    ------------------------------------------------------------------




  • 2.  Re: Fw: [docbook-apps] Namespace issues with titlepage templates in slides

    Posted 05-11-2013 05:05
    On Friday, May 10, 2013 06:01:22 PM Jirka Kosek wrote:
    > On 8.5.2013 7:19, Bob Stayton wrote:
    > > Would have time to take a look at this? It seems Alexey spent a
    > > great deal of time sorting out the namespace issues for the DocBook
    > > titlepage template system, and has proposed many improvements. As
    > > far as I can tell, they make sense, but I think you should look at
    > > it.
    >
    > Sure, I originally skipped message as from subject line I got impression
    > it's related to slides only.

    Sorry for a confusing title. This originated as a narrow fix for slides templates, but,
    through that notorious "let's-fix-one-more-issue" approach quickly evolved into a
    rework of namespace handling.

    > > This issue, however, shows that the titlepage.xsl is not not fully
    > > namespace aware. First, it shouldn't "autoguess" the namespace for
    > > t:wrapper - instead, it should just discover the namespace referred
    > > to by the t:wrapper attribute.
    >
    > Autoguessing is here just for backward compatibility. Ideally namespace
    > should be passed by ns parameter. Problems you have seen in slides
    > titlepages are caused by missing ns parameter in the build script.

    I agree that the problem was the slides templates were incorrectly generated - I stated
    so in my original email. However, my point is that target namespace can be precisely
    determined by checking the namespace declaration for the wrapper element; this
    approach works even if that element has no namespace declaration (as in HTML).

    > > Attached patches deal with these issues:
    > Thanks for the patches. There are many good ideas in your code, but I'm
    > little bit worried about backward compatibility -- in past we have tried
    > very hard to keep old titlepage templates to work with newer versions of
    > stylesheets. I'm not sure whether this is still true with all your
    > proposed changes.

    Unfortunately, it is not possible to fix the issues with namespace while fully preserving
    backwards compatibility: as I mentioned in the original email, the problem is that some
    of the current templates use the default namespace for elements from different XML
    vocabularies: for example, XHTML and DocBook:

    <t:titlepage-content t:side="recto">


  • 3.  Re: Fw: [docbook-apps] Namespace issues with titlepage templates in slides

    Posted 05-14-2013 11:36
    On 11.5.2013 7:05, Alexey Neyman wrote:

    > I agree that the problem was the slides templates were incorrectly generated - I stated
    > so in my original email. However, my point is that target namespace can be precisely
    > determined by checking the namespace declaration for the wrapper element; this
    > approach works even if that element has no namespace declaration (as in HTML).

    Indeed

    > As you see, this template uses default namespace for title/subtitle (DocBook
    > elements) as well as hr (XHTML element).

    But might be your code might be extended to handle this case as well and
    emit warning message?

    > Indeed, I do. I thought that docbook-xsl and docbook-xsl-ns are separate packages,
    > isn't it so?

    No, they are generated from the single source which currently is
    docbook-xsl. During the build process correct namespace declarations and
    d: prefixes are added into all XPath expressions and docbook-xsl-ns is
    created.

    > If it is not the case, could you explain which one is considered "master" distribution, ns-
    > aware or non-ns version? And how one is produced from the other? I could probably
    > modify the stylesheet to account for that case as well.

    Currently master one is non-ns version, but there is plan to reverse the
    process in a due future.

    Conversion is done by xslns-build Perl script in releasetools directory.

    Jirka

    --
    ------------------------------------------------------------------
    Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz http://xmlguru.cz
    ------------------------------------------------------------------
    Professional XML consulting and training services
    DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
    ------------------------------------------------------------------
    OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 rep.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------
    Bringing you XML Prague conference http://xmlprague.cz
    ------------------------------------------------------------------