Hi,
Bob Stayton wrote:
> I believe this is a FOP limitation,including 0.95, supposedly fixed in
> the trunk version[1].
Yes, that’s right. However...
> Is anyone using the trunk version of FOP that can test this
> problem?
>
> [1]
>
3cA22DDB82-F860-4A12-8A0A-A1280CE4C2BF@telenet.be%3e">http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/xmlgraphics-fop-users/200807.mbox/%
3cA22DDB82-F860-4A12-8A0A-A1280CE4C2BF@telenet.be%3e
>
>
> The current workaround is to put the character inside an fo:inline with
> an explicit setting of font-family="Symbol".
... people may want to stick to that approach for the moment, as on my
small test I noticed baseline alignment issues, that don’t appear when
using fo:inline.
> My book describes a way to
> do that:
>
>
http://www.sagehill.net/docbookxsl/SpecialChars.html#SwitchSymbol>
> Bob Stayton
> Sagehill Enterprises
>
bobs@sagehill.net<snip/>
Vincent