emergency-comment

 View Only

  • 1.  EM TC Meeting - Errata documents for EDXL-RM and EDXL-HAVE ?

    Posted 08-05-2009 11:18
    Rex,



    I'm not quite sure of the correct location of the EDXL-RM and EDXL-HAVE
    Errata documents for our review. I found these EDXL-RM documents in the
    specifications section, but they don't list any changes for EDXL-RM and
    nothing for EDXL-HAVE for errata:
    http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/documents.php



    Is this the right place to look? If not can you point me to a link?



    Timothy D. Gilmore | SAIC

    Senior Test Engineer | ILPSG | NIMS SC | NIMS STEP

    phone: 606.274.2063 | fax: 606.274.2012

    mobile: 606.219.7882 | email: gilmoret@us.saic.com

    P Please consider the environment before printing this email.






  • 2.  Re: EM TC Meeting - Errata documents for EDXL-RM and EDXL-HAVE ?

    Posted 08-05-2009 13:09
    Hi Timothy,

    The "MarkedChanges" version of EDXL-RM shows where the changes were
    made, (all were in the Conformance Section). The link is
    http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/download.php/33475/EDXL-RM-v1.0-errata-MarkedChanges.doc
    The Errata itself is immediately below it at
    http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/download.php/33474/EDXL-RM-v1.0-errata.doc

    Sukumar indicated that the EDXL-HAVE Errata and the version with Marked
    Changes is in the EM-Msg SC Documents Page, (the DOM and the Data
    Dictionary have changes), and I am including the links here
    Errata:
    http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency-msg/download.php/33496/EDXL-HAVE-ErrataChanges.doc
    Errata with Marked Changes:
    http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency-msg/download.php/33530/EDXL-HAVE-v1.0-Errata-MarkedChanges.doc

    Cheers,
    Rex

    Gilmore, Timothy wrote:
    >
    > Rex,
    >
    > I’m not quite sure of the correct location of the EDXL-RM and
    > EDXL-HAVE Errata documents for our review. I found these EDXL-RM
    > documents in the specifications section, but they don’t list any
    > changes for EDXL-RM and nothing for EDXL-HAVE for errata:
    > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/documents.php
    >
    > Is this the right place to look? If not can you point me to a link?
    >
    > *Timothy D. Gilmore* | SAIC
    >
    > Senior Test Engineer | ILPSG | NIMS SC | NIMS STEP
    >
    > phone: 606.274.2063 | fax: 606.274.2012
    >
    > mobile: 606.219.7882 | email: gilmoret@us.saic.com
    > <mailto:gilmoret@us.saic.com>
    >
    > P Please consider the environment before printing this email.
    >


    --
    Rex Brooks
    President, CEO
    Starbourne Communications Design
    GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison
    Berkeley, CA 94702
    Tel: 510-898-0670




  • 3.  RE: EM TC Meeting - Errata documents for EDXL-RM and EDXL-HAVE ?

    Posted 08-05-2009 13:35
    Rex,

    Thank you for sending the links. I have reviewed the errata's for
    EDXL-RM and EDXL-HAVE and approve the corrections made.

    Thanks,

    Timothy D. Gilmore | SAIC

    Senior Test Engineer | ILPSG | NIMS SC | NIMS STEP
    phone: 606.274.2063 | fax: 606.274.2012
    mobile: 606.219.7882 | email: gilmoret@us.saic.com
    P Please consider the environment before printing this email.



    Original Message


  • 4.  Re: EM TC Meeting - Errata documents for EDXL-RM and EDXL-HAVE ?

    Posted 08-05-2009 17:10
    Thanks timothy,

    Good to hear.

    Cheers,
    Rex

    Gilmore, Timothy wrote:
    > Rex,
    >
    > Thank you for sending the links. I have reviewed the errata's for
    > EDXL-RM and EDXL-HAVE and approve the corrections made.
    >
    > Thanks,
    >
    > Timothy D. Gilmore | SAIC
    >
    > Senior Test Engineer | ILPSG | NIMS SC | NIMS STEP
    > phone: 606.274.2063 | fax: 606.274.2012
    > mobile: 606.219.7882 | email: gilmoret@us.saic.com
    > P Please consider the environment before printing this email.
    >
    >
    >
    Original Message


  • 5.  Microsoft gets XML patent

    Posted 08-07-2009 00:52
    Thought everyone might be interested in this recent Slashdot posting:

    On Tuesday, Microsoft was granted U.S. Patent No.7,571,169 for its
    'invention' of the Word-processing document stored in a single XML
    file that may be manipulated by applications that understand XML.
    Presumably developers are protected by Microsoft's 'covenant not to
    sue', so the biggest question raised by this patent is: How in the
    world was it granted in light of the 40-year history of document
    markup languages? Next thing you know, the USPTO will give Microsoft
    a patent for Providing Emergency Data in XML format. Oops, too late.



Related Content