virtio-comment

 View Only
  • 1.  delta between branch 1.4 and master

    Posted 01-17-2024 09:58
    Hi Cornelia,

    Currently virtio spec, 1.4 branch has 6 patches which are not present in master.
    And master branch has 16 patches which are not present in 1.4 branch.

    Is there a plan to sync both the trees?
    Patches should be sent against which branch master or 1.4?

    Parav



  • 2.  Re: [virtio-comment] delta between branch 1.4 and master

    Posted 01-17-2024 15:40
    On Wed, Jan 17 2024, Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com> wrote:

    > Hi Cornelia,
    >
    > Currently virtio spec, 1.4 branch has 6 patches which are not present in master.
    > And master branch has 16 patches which are not present in 1.4 branch.
    >
    > Is there a plan to sync both the trees?
    > Patches should be sent against which branch master or 1.4?

    This situation will be resolved by merging the 1.4 branch into master --
    once 1.3 is finally done, which is waiting on voting and OASIS
    processes, which is waiting on the OASIS infrastructure
    migration... really sorry about the long delay, but if I had opened a
    vote, I'm sure that Murphy would have scheduled the migration right in
    the middle of the voting period. I will update once I have news.

    If you have any patches, please base them on the 1.4 branch.




  • 3.  RE: [virtio-comment] delta between branch 1.4 and master

    Posted 01-18-2024 06:50


    > From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
    > Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2024 9:10 PM
    >
    > On Wed, Jan 17 2024, Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com> wrote:
    >
    > > Hi Cornelia,
    > >
    > > Currently virtio spec, 1.4 branch has 6 patches which are not present in
    > master.
    > > And master branch has 16 patches which are not present in 1.4 branch.
    > >
    > > Is there a plan to sync both the trees?
    > > Patches should be sent against which branch master or 1.4?
    >
    > This situation will be resolved by merging the 1.4 branch into master -- once
    > 1.3 is finally done, which is waiting on voting and OASIS processes, which is
    > waiting on the OASIS infrastructure migration... really sorry about the long
    > delay, but if I had opened a vote, I'm sure that Murphy would have scheduled
    > the migration right in the middle of the voting period. I will update once I
    > have news.
    >
    > If you have any patches, please base them on the 1.4 branch.

    Ok. Will use 1.4 branch. Thank you for the updates.