xliff-comment

 View Only

  • 1.  XLIFF 1.2 Specification: Normative references (editorial)

    Posted 05-03-2007 19:08
    The draft at http://docs.oasis-open.org/xliff/v1.2/pr03/xliff-core.html
    has a normative reference to XML 1.0 dated Sept 2006 which is fine.
    However, it also says "Second Edition", and the link (and Sept 2006
    date) refer to the Fourth Edition.

    I note you don't list editions for Namespaces in XML (which is at
    the Second Edition). I also note the references are not to the
    dated versions, but to the generic versions which will change.
    That is, http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/ will someday point to
    the Fifth Edition with a different date. If you are going to
    put the date and/or refer to a specific edition, you should use
    the dated URLs, e.g., http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-20060816.
    Your choice, but the Edition, date, and URL should be consistent
    with one another.

    paul



  • 2.  RE: [xliff-comment] XLIFF 1.2 Specification: Normative references (editorial)

    Posted 05-04-2007 19:39
    Paul,

    Thank you for very much for sharing your observation. I like your
    advise. I am in contact with our TC members and our TC administrator so
    we can plan our next step.

    We will publish our disposition to this comment list by the end of the
    review period, or sooner.

    Thanks,

    Bryan Schnabel



    Original Message


Related Content