UBL Naming and Design Rules SC

 View Only

Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Rule: 96 Two Schema

  • 1.  Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Rule: 96 Two Schema

    Posted 07-17-2003 02:04
    Precisely!  When stated as a rule, it is unnecessarily 
    restrictive for user to accomodate this rule when situation
    may not call for such.  
    
    If you're talking about UBL's packaging, please read my 
    second paragraph.
    
    
    
    Best Regards,
    Chin Chee-Kai
    SoftML
    Tel: +65-6820-2979
    Fax: +65-6743-7875
    Email: cheekai@SoftML.Net
    http://SoftML.Net/
    
    
    On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Dan Vint wrote:
    
    >>Removing it allows one to do or not do this. I believe the general request
    >>is to provide these two forms of the schema and there should be a
    >>rule/requirement that states this.
    >>
    >>..dan
    >>
    >>
    >>At 10:51 PM 7/15/2003 +0800, Chin Chee-Kai wrote:
    >>>Objection : Stating two versions of schemas that are
    >>>             otherwise the same except for documentation
    >>>             is a user-level optimisation/preference issue
    >>>             that shouldn't become a hard-rule from UBL/NDR.
    >>>
    >>>This is not to say that we cannot publish as a non-normative
    >>>add-on, or reading aid or optimized version (assuming
    >>>documented version is normative).
    >>>
    >>>Suggest removing it.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>Best Regards,
    >>>Chin Chee-Kai
    >>>SoftML
    >>>Tel: +65-6820-2979
    >>>Fax: +65-6743-7875
    >>>Email: cheekai@SoftML.Net
    >>>http://SoftML.Net/
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Lisa-Aeon wrote:
    >>>
    >>> >>Rules for Voting:  Each email will have only one rule in it, I will try to
    >>> >>mark the rules that group with it, or rules that might duplicate it.  The
    >>> >>membership has 5 working days to bring forth objection or discussion, after
    >>> >>the 5 working days, if there are no objections, the rule will be assumed to
    >>> >>be "ACCEPTED" and be given to the LCSC for their implementation.
    >>> >>
    >>> >>Please Reply leaving first email in Reply.
    >>> >>
    >>> >>Voting period on this rule ends:  July 22, 2003
    >>> >>
    >>> >>*******************************
    >>> >>[R 96]  Two schemas shall be developed for each standard.  One schema shall
    >>> >>be a run-time schema devoid of documentation. One schema shall be a fully
    >>> >>annotated schema that employs XHTML for the annotations.
    >>> >>
    >>> >>
    >>> >>ATG Decision:  ACCEPTED.
    >>> >>
    >>> >>
    >>> >>---
    >>> >>Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
    >>> >>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
    >>> >>Version: 6.0.498 / Virus Database: 297 - Release Date: 7/8/2003
    >>> >>
    >>>
    >>
    >>