UBL Naming and Design Rules SC

 View Only

Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Fw: [ubl-lcsc] ccts Annotation Structure (fwd)

  • 1.  Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Fw: [ubl-lcsc] ccts Annotation Structure (fwd)

    Posted 06-30-2003 01:33
    Again, this two schemas per model rule is also something
    I feel is rather stringent to be stated as a rule, or that
    it is redundant.
    
    Developers and users will find their own most suitable form
    of optimizing for processing.  It shouldn't be a specified
    form of rule for such purposes.
    
    
    
    
    Best Regards,
    Chin Chee-Kai
    SoftML
    Tel: +65-6820-2979
    Fax: +65-6743-7875
    Email: cheekai@SoftML.Net
    http://SoftML.Net/
    
    
    On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Lisa-Aeon wrote:
    
    >>I am forwarding this from the FPSC and LCSC since this has to do with the
    >>embedded documentation in the schema.  The only rule we have in the
    >>checklist is R96, which states:
    >>
    >>"Two schemas shall be developed for each standard.  One schema shall be a
    >>run-time schema devoid of documentation. One schema shall be a fully
    >>annotated schema that employs XHTML for the annotations."
    >>
    >>There is not description of how it is to be used and can be intrepreted in
    >>many different ways.  Shall we join this discussion?
    >>
    >>I know that we voted on using xsd:documentation and not xsd:appinfo, for
    >>embedded documentation, I think there should be a rule saying this.
    >>
    >>Lisa
    >>
    >>
    >>