UBL Naming and Design Rules SC

 View Only

RE: [ubl-ndrsc] Arofan's RT/CCT Draft Definitions

  • 1.  RE: [ubl-ndrsc] Arofan's RT/CCT Draft Definitions

    Posted 04-11-2002 11:07
    My version 0.1 recommendations (ccts-comments-ubl-0-1.doc) attempt to integrate my properties proposal with Arofan's RT/CCT one.  At least the proposed _metamodel_ is integrated (I left a placeholder for his prose -- to be added).  Arofan has agreed to look at that document and comment on the metamodel (does it reflect his proposal accurately).   Have you got the LCSC comments in a form that I can see, Tim?  If they aren't too onerous I could take a crack at integrating them in version 0.2.