UBL Naming and Design Rules SC

 View Only

RE: [ubl-lcsc] Re: [ubl-ndrsc] xsd:documentation vs xsd:appinfo

  • 1.  RE: [ubl-lcsc] Re: [ubl-ndrsc] xsd:documentation vs xsd:appinfo

    Posted 08-27-2003 11:11
     MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

    ubl-ndrsc message

    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


    Subject: RE: [ubl-lcsc] Re: [ubl-ndrsc] xsd:documentation vs xsd:appinfo


    On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, CRAWFORD, Mark wrote:
    
    >>We are under no obligation to use a particular feature of XSD, 
    >>only to use XSD.  We have made many decisions regarding the
    >>appropriateness of using certain features - that is what NDR is
    >>all about.  
    
    Many of those decisions were also reviewed, re-decided,
    deprecated and expanded.  I'm not sure sometimes certain
    decisions made are the most corret, but we go along anyway.
    But some are just plain irky -- that's what the debate is all about.
    
    Why <documentation> then?
    
    
    
    >>Exactly.  And we, as NDR determined that the right thing 
    >>was to avoid the use of AppInfo to ensure broadest market 
    >>appeal.  I have a business case that says that we will 
    >>loose part of our audience if we include normative AppInfo 
    >>in our schema. 
    
    I'm sure it has been appropriately assessed then that 
    that single business case represents more than 80% of 
    the world's estimated market for business....
    
    
    Thanks.
    
    
    
    Best Regards,
    Chin Chee-Kai
    SoftML
    Tel: +65-6820-2979
    Fax: +65-6743-7875
    Email: cheekai@SoftML.Net
    http://SoftML.Net/
    
    
    
    


    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]