UBL Naming and Design Rules SC

 View Only

[ubl-lcsc] Resolution on BBIEs and complexTypes

  • 1.  [ubl-lcsc] Resolution on BBIEs and complexTypes

    Posted 10-29-2003 17:07
     MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

    ubl-ndrsc message

    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


    Subject: [ubl-lcsc] Resolution on BBIEs and complexTypes


    Greetings to LCSC
    
    Good news and apologies from NDRSC.
    
    The NDRSC agreed today that the BBIEs are indeed linked to 
    the complexTypes which comprise the CCTs, so they do keep to the NDR rules. In fact there are just one or two CCTs
     which aren't based on complexTypes and these appear
     to be properly based on simpleTypes in accordance with rule STD1.
    So, although NDRSC intend to spend time at the F2F 
    going through the rules and schemas almost 
    word-by-word as much as circumstances permit, 
    there are no known issues now at the moment.
    Hopefully this is good news for LCSC. Does it mean though that there will now be a call on Friday? 
    
    All the best
    
    Steve
    
    >>> "CRAWFORD, Mark" <MCRAWFORD@lmi.org> 10/29/03 16:55 PM >>>
    Btw, these are not new. They were approved in Montreal and included on the first post montreal checklist.
    Mark Crawford
    Research Fellow - LMI XML Lead
    W3C Advisory Committee, OASIS, RosettaNet Representative
    Vice Chair - OASIS UBL TC & Chair Naming and Design Rules Subcommittee
    Chair - UN/CEFACT XML Syntax Working Group
    Editor - UN/CEFACT Core Components
    ______
    Logistics Management Institute
    2000 Corporate Ridge, McLean, VA 22102-7805
    (703) 917-7177   Fax (703) 917-7481 
    Wireless (703) 655-4810
    mcrawford@lmi.org
    http://www.lmi.org
    "Opportunity is what you make of it"