UBL Naming and Design Rules SC

 View Only

RE: [ubl-ndrsc] Fw: [ubl-lcsc] ccts Annotation Structure (fwd)

  • 1.  RE: [ubl-ndrsc] Fw: [ubl-lcsc] ccts Annotation Structure (fwd)

    Posted 06-30-2003 01:40
    It seems that the design of namespace values by itself is already
    not immutable over time with or without this discussion.
    
    The appending of version numbers to namespaces means namespace
    values will change in time, which is not good and does not help
    in migration phase from version changes.
    
    
    
    Best Regards,
    Chin Chee-Kai
    SoftML
    Tel: +65-6820-2979
    Fax: +65-6743-7875
    Email: cheekai@SoftML.Net
    http://SoftML.Net/
    
    
    On Sat, 28 Jun 2003, Burcham, Bill wrote:
    
    >>Would such a rule not conflict with the NDRSC rule that namespaces be
    >>immutable over time?  The rule below means to me that I can't count on a
    >>particular namespace name reliably identifying a particular schema.
    >>
    >>If we want to have optional documentation, then I think we should define it
    >>externally from the get go.  Anything that sits in the schemas as
    >>annotations is there for good.  Right?
    >>
    >>